Weasel
Member
- Location
- in the hills
If there’s more money to be made by planting them, then it sounds like the farms are not viable...
They are viable!
If there’s more money to be made by planting them, then it sounds like the farms are not viable...
Ok lets be gentle here - there are plenty of cases where the letter of the law is less than naturally just, there is a balance to strike between tenants and landlords and the balance is a little different between the two countries.
Nobody likes losing thier job - its happened to me several times and it was not much fun at all.
In this case we are possibly looking at a significant re-organisation and its not to be wondered if that is a hard pill to swallo, although his arguments could be better expressed.
They are viable!
I accept that it seems unfair to those affected, but one of the most important lessons I learned, at a young age no less, was that the world isn't fair.
It's full of fat cats and starving dogs, and always will be.
Only if you completely ignore the opportunity cost of the capital, obviously. In fairness that's true of all farms I'll bet.
The marvel of capitalism is that it allows starving dogs to become fat cats.
The effects you dscribe occur because farming is uneconomic, rural depopulation has been happening throughout centuries.
Because of forestry!!!!!!
All you lot of bandits that like the idea of farms getting planted, why don't you plant your own places????
See, I was always told that depopulation occirred when wealthy landlords threw out their tenants so they could clear the hills and run sheep...
Isn't that what the Clearances were about?
And I can't help thinking that up here in Scotland this isn't so much a matter of forest v. farming, but a land ownership problem; too much in too few hands...
I will, almost certainly. When I bought this place I bought it safe in the knowledge that I could recover the entire purchase price by developing a fairly small proportion of it for housing.
Planting houses is the best return for my money on that acreage, the rest of it will become a big garden full of fruit trees, hardwoods and deer.
So your a money grabber
You mean capitalist? Yes, absolutely.
See, I was always told that depopulation occurred when wealthy landlords threw out their tenants so they could clear the hills and run sheep...
Isn't that what the Clearances were about?
And I can't help thinking that up here in Scotland this isn't so much a matter of forest v. farming, but a land ownership problem; too much in too few hands...
Who do you think you are?
Depends which era you want to discuss - significant depopulation took place in the highlands as you describe, a very similar set of events took place in the lowlands but somewhat earlier and over a slightly longer timescale.
If memory serves correct I recently read that farming employment has decreased by 90% in the last century.
I am familiar with my little corner of Galloway and the farm my old man worked on as ploughman had 4 full time men when he was alive - the farmers sons now run 7 farms with 4 full time men.
Of the class went through secondary school with (30 ish) I think 2 live and work in the area - all the rest are gone.
Loads of village schools, pubs, shops etc etc closed - new forestry in the last 25 years - couple of hundred acres. Rural depopulation is an ongoing process which has naff all to do with forestry.
On your last point I think our thoughts are aligned - lots of legal stuff took place - not all of it was justice.
I think you have the cart in front of the horse young fellow