Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cowabunga" data-source="post: 7626643" data-attributes="member: 718"><p>With particular reference to [USER=33090]@Highland Mule[/USER], the Tess Laurie paper has been peer reviewed and published in the USA. Here is a commentary on its context and content.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]3j7am9kjMrk[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>The validity of the data, certainty of evidence, is graded as being 'moderate' which is one off the best which is 'high'. There are two lower levels of certainty below moderate. This is in relation to the 62% reduction in death.</p><p>In already hospitalised patients it reduced death from 7.8% down to 2.3%</p><p>Prophylaxis used in India, Peru, Mexico and Chile with an average reduction in infections of 86%.</p><p>Adverse events couldn't be assessed, basically because there were none.</p><p>I believe, from other sources, that the overwhelming majority of clinicians that used the product were and are now convinced of its efficacy and safety.</p><p></p><p>Watch the video for a synopsis. It is a very fair assessment of clinician led research. </p><p>There is far more evidence and indeed better certainty than for many treatments officially recommended for use during treatment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cowabunga, post: 7626643, member: 718"] With particular reference to [USER=33090]@Highland Mule[/USER], the Tess Laurie paper has been peer reviewed and published in the USA. Here is a commentary on its context and content. [MEDIA=youtube]3j7am9kjMrk[/MEDIA] The validity of the data, certainty of evidence, is graded as being 'moderate' which is one off the best which is 'high'. There are two lower levels of certainty below moderate. This is in relation to the 62% reduction in death. In already hospitalised patients it reduced death from 7.8% down to 2.3% Prophylaxis used in India, Peru, Mexico and Chile with an average reduction in infections of 86%. Adverse events couldn't be assessed, basically because there were none. I believe, from other sources, that the overwhelming majority of clinicians that used the product were and are now convinced of its efficacy and safety. Watch the video for a synopsis. It is a very fair assessment of clinician led research. There is far more evidence and indeed better certainty than for many treatments officially recommended for use during treatment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Ivermectin , covid cure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top