- Location
- Bury St Edmunds
Has anyone upgraded from the sf 3000 receiver to the latest sf 6000 one? If so what is the verdict? How much better/worse is it on sf1 activation?
Has anyone upgraded from the sf 3000 receiver to the latest sf 6000 one? If so what is the verdict? How much better/worse is it on sf1 activation?
Than you very useful. Its the convergence time that I'm interested in ...my sf3000 seems to be taking a lot longer nowadays to get to 90% and takes forever to teach 100% so considering upgrading the receiver .....I've got both 3000 and 6000 receivers. The SF3 SF6000 is much quicker to acquire signal & accuracy. The SF3000 on SF2 takes 15 minutes to get good enough for autotrac and twice that to get to full accuracy. That's after driving to the field through woodland with no overhead view to lose all satellites & SF signal. Sorry - I can't help on SF1 on the SF6000 as I've never tried it.
I know someone who's been on sf2 on a 3000 and has just got a new 6000 and they've not swapped the activation yet so has done all spring work on sf1 and he's saying it's probably not worth bothering swapping it over and leaving it on older dome so they have another one with decent accuracy
More or less yesJust to be clear ....your friend is saying that SF1 on a 6000 is as good as SF2 on a 3000?
I used one of my 'credits' on a big day drilling in the Autumn and it said sf2, but guessing thats my display.Not sf2 ? Seems odd doesn’t it?
Not receiver fault though?! Atu?but does struggle sometimes on ploughed & pressed banks with a front press
If you used a grace period that would mean receiver and screen on sf2 we drilled a field on a grace period as it's right next to a main road and as a trial to see what it was like and couldn't see a difference to be honest it was still missing the odd wee bitI used one of my 'credits' on a big day drilling in the Autumn and it said sf2, but guessing thats my display.