Valtra Man
Member
Thank you. Ordered Always wondered about the accuracy with the stamp on soil cores sent to the lab because of the bits of lime on the surface. Looking forward to compare resultsPM sent
Thank you. Ordered Always wondered about the accuracy with the stamp on soil cores sent to the lab because of the bits of lime on the surface. Looking forward to compare resultsPM sent
Well you'll have a very accurate test now. Did some fields last week, all came back from lab at 7.3 to 7.7 but areas and patches as low as 5.5 in some fields with the BDH kit.Thank you. Ordered Always wondered about the accuracy with the stamp on soil cores sent to the lab because of the bits of lime on the surface. Looking forward to compare results
That’s my exact concern. Neglected lime for a few years but then tested whole farm with not very impressive results. Tested again over next few years after liming with some results overly impressive considering the amount of lime gone on. Some lime I’ve used you can still see on the surface now so always thought that might influence lab results so been meaning to buy my own tester for years. Reading this thread has given me the boot needed to get onelooking forward to using itWell you'll have a very accurate test now. Did some fields last week, all came back from lab at 7.3 to 7.7 but areas and patches as low as 5.5 in some fields with the BDH kit.
I’ll take all the advice I can get so appreciate anything you or anyone else advises.If carrying out your own sampling, please be mindful of a couple of things.
You MUST keep different soil types separate. In some areas of the country soil types will vary massively within fields so this must be taken into account when collecting samples.
Also, take note of the aspect of the land, rises and dips, low spots along water courses, sites of old buildings etc. Again, this could all make a difference, as will old field boundaries often made obvious by lines of trees. They knew where to put hedges all those years ago.
It’s sometimes a long, laborious job, but it needs doing properly if an accurate pH is to be found in all areas.
I hope I’m not stating the obvious, but over the years I’ve learnt that not all farmers are as careful collecting samples as they ought to be!!
I had an old customer call once to ask if I could sample fields for pH. I explained I was flat out so it may not be for a week or so. He asked about collecting samples and we spoke about how to do it, how to separate soil types, numbering all the bags, drawing a simple map to know where the samples were from etc. He went off happy with that and said he would drop the soils for two 20 acre fields round to my yard a couple of days later.
The map was very good, he had taken approximately 40-50 cores of soil in each field and written on the map just where they were from. He had plotted trees, a pond and an old boundary very accurately for a hand drawn map.
But all the soil sample were mixed up in two buckets named North 20 and Burges!!
I do it differently to Pete. Using the kits with test tubes, plan where you want to sample in a field. Usually at least 1 per 2 acres but you can do as many as you want.I’ll take all the advice I can get so appreciate anything you or anyone else advises.
I’ve not really looked into it that much so I’m hoping it’s fairly straight forward. Would you say it’s better to collect all samples and take home to test or pick a dry day and do them on the spot sort of thing?
Our fields are pretty small so would probably only need to test each half. I’m guessing you would still take and test individual test spots rather than numerous and bulk and mix like lab tests?
Surely you would have made sure the ph is right first before sowing , if low you would correct ph first before spending more on a reseed .
Perhaps we should start a lower grass seed inputs thread as well as there seems to be alot of people happy to help us part with our hard earned cash.
In another book I read the author said the best grass leys he seen was on farms that spread little & often
To be honest I can't remember something like Modern Grassland Management, my ex girlfriend use to work for the local Ag college so handy for borrowing books from their librarywhich book was that?
Yes , visually I would say it works, fields that have been spread look greener and healthier but the dirty water could have done that and we've had a good growing period lately.
Yes that was the point, low rates of lime mixed with either dirty water or FYM.So you’ve tried several things all at once then?
I think that's partly the point, your neutralising what your putting on?It's a shame then that muck lowers pH , maybe adding lime to the muck helps , but then why not just spread lime and muck in the field
I was brought up with "Don't manure and lime at the same time" for the reason that Lime will react with Nitrogen [in the manure] to produce Ammonia (gas) so the Nitrogen will be lost .