That would be the best bet, more straw for the pigs, would they benefit and fatten faster? With current planning regs, convert another shed and house more pigs if they pay? As there won't be many new sheds built anytime soon
We're not particularly tight with straw now, but it certainly won't slow them. Another pig shed on the way, got pp this summer.That would be the best bet, more straw for the pigs, would they benefit and fatten faster? With current planning regs, convert another shed and house more pigs if they pay? As there won't be many new sheds built anytime soon
Wowzers.
Just spread your dung. Adding cost and work to make compost out of fym is the most absurd thing I've heard. Why?
Imo the best and cheapest thing you can do to improve FYM is push it up into a big tidy heap as soon as possible after tipping in the field. Less surface area to volume like that and allows it to heat up and rot down into something more powerful per ton faster.
leaving it scattered across a field a trailer load at a time is the worst thing you can do.
I am looking at the potential of making compost as a soil improver, partly to get more benefit from the muck on the farm.
I've done a little reading, but need to do more. Malcolm Beck seems to be a man that talks in practical terms, think I'll have a read of his book.
Currently we produce about 1200t of fym per year, due to rise to 2000t within a year, all straw based
We have some grass that we currently make hay of, that potentially could become a compost ingredient
Bark peelings are available locally at sensible money
Limex a likely addition?
Adding more straw is also a possibility.
What is unclear is the C:N target - some say 1:1, some say as much as 30:1 Carbon:Nitrogen ratio.
Some say muck is a carbon source, some say its a nitrogen source.
I don't want to create a lot of work and worry for nothing, but would like to maximise what I have got.
Thank you
I was exploring how to get the same benefit from less tons/ac applied - thereby lowering transport costs and allowing more acres to receive the benefit.Why do you think composting will get you more benefit from your muck?
Ok. By composting, the microbes that do the breakdown are respiring and releasing some of the carbon in the feedstocks and a chunk will be lost as CO2 to the atmosphere. Don't you really want that carbon to be in the soil to feed the microbes which are part of the soil 'food chain'? By giving soil fauna the carbon they'll then in turn contribute to nutrient cycling in the soil and help maintain a better soil structure etc. (they'll also release CO2 but will also have been contributing to soil health)I was exploring how to get the same benefit from less tons/ac applied - thereby lowering transport costs and allowing more acres to receive the benefit.
Why compost? Lots of dd people seem to use it, and some potato growers. It's a means of utilising fairly cheap potential soil amendments
Am I missing something? I know people do muck for straw, why not do muck for hay, but sell the hay and charge them to take away the muck unless it straw or straw pellets, or even get them to deep litter your bark chippings.I am looking at the potential of making compost as a soil improver, partly to get more benefit from the muck on the farm.
I've done a little reading, but need to do more. Malcolm Beck seems to be a man that talks in practical terms, think I'll have a read of his book.
Currently we produce about 1200t of fym per year, due to rise to 2000t within a year, all straw based
We have some grass that we currently make hay of, that potentially could become a compost ingredient
Bark peelings are available locally at sensible money
Limex a likely addition?
Adding more straw is also a possibility.
What is unclear is the C:N target - some say 1:1, some say as much as 30:1 Carbon:Nitrogen ratio.
Some say muck is a carbon source, some say its a nitrogen source.
I don't want to create a lot of work and worry for nothing, but would like to maximise what I have got.
Thank you
I was meaning grass as a compost ingredient, rather than hay, taken as an early first or late second cut (the other being the hay cut)Am I missing something? I know people do muck for straw, why not do muck for hay, but sell the hay and charge them to take away the muck unless it straw or straw pellets, or even get them to deep litter your bark chippings.
Hope I'm not letting out official secrets but on a recent BASE webinar with Frederic Thomas in France he said that you would be better off putting dung / slurry on cover crops rather than composting, as you lose a lot of ammonia in the composting process.
Ok. By composting, the microbes that do the breakdown are respiring and releasing some of the carbon in the feedstocks and a chunk will be lost as CO2 to the atmosphere. Don't you really want that carbon to be in the soil to feed the microbes which are part of the soil 'food chain'? By giving soil fauna the carbon they'll then in turn contribute to nutrient cycling in the soil and help maintain a better soil structure etc. (they'll also release CO2 but will also have been contributing to soil health)
There's nothing wrong with compost but in FYM you've got a great material.
I'm trying to get my head around why you'd grow grass, dry it for hay then process into compost to apply to arable land (i'm assuming arable, apologies if wrong!), my first thought is that seems to be inefficient somehow, couldn't you get that grass through an animal first?
Graph shows you that by using FYM winter cereals yield slightly greater than greenwaste compost etc.
View attachment 927724
There's nothing stopping you from mixing your other organic materials with your FYM and spreading it at the same time.
Could you take grass cuttings and wood chips, leaves etc from landscape gardeners and tree surgeons? A farmer we contract farm on is a tree surgeon and takes the above waste from other businesses. . He pushes it up into big piles and composts it for years.Thank you for that