Massey Ferguson 390 loader

Poleson

Member
Location
Shetland
Hi, I’m looking for some info, we have a 4wd 390 with the 6 stud front axle with a Massey Ferguson 885 loader fitted, it’s a horrible loader so we are looking to fit something better, a Quicke or similar. I can’t seem to find many loaders with 390 brackets so I am wondering if there are brackets for other tractors which would be able to be altered to suit. I have found a Faucheux F30 loader with brackets but I’ve not seen one and there is no photos of it on the tractor so I’m unsure if it would be much of an improvement. Any info greatly appreciated
 

Mrs Brown

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Orkney Islands
We had a 885 fitted to a 390 and as you found it was a terrible thing it was just too big for that size of tractor and was in fact not bloody safe. We got shot of it but didn't fit any thing else to the 390. Don't know if the 880 would fit your tractor brackets but that would be better suited to a 390 any one near you have one that you could try see if it would fit on your existing brackets. MF moved on to Quicky loaders and they are a good match and had a better bucket/fork attachment device, would think there would be quite a few of that model available. Never seen a Faucheur loader but MF didn't stick with them very long so that might tell you some thing.
 

Poleson

Member
Location
Shetland
We had a 885 fitted to a 390 and as you found it was a terrible thing it was just too big for that size of tractor and was in fact not bloody safe. We got shot of it but didn't fit any thing else to the 390. Don't know if the 880 would fit your tractor brackets but that would be better suited to a 390 any one near you have one that you could try see if it would fit on your existing brackets. MF moved on to Quicky loaders and they are a good match and had a better bucket/fork attachment device, would think there would be quite a few of that model available. Never seen a Faucheur loader but MF didn't stick with them very long so that might tell you some thing.

Is the 880 not just the 885 without the self levelling? Yes I would have thought there would be plenty Quicke loaders about but the brackets seem to be the problem. Probably lots gone for export and been scrapped.
 

SMID

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Sorn Ayrshire
The 880S was a good 390 loader just that bit shorter than the 880 Carrs of Annan must have sold a pile of them we had an 880S after a couple of 880s their,s a pretty good chance the brackets are all the same thats the problem with the 885 it was made long enough for the 6 cylinders but sticks a mile out in front of a 390.
 

Mrs Brown

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Orkney Islands
The problem with the Steelfab Massey loaders (80/880) was they were deigned for the attachment to fit between the arms but modern attachments got too big and ended up sticking 2 feet too far out pulling the hydraulic ram to bits. The 885 was beefed up and a contraption called a quick hitch was fitted but was still way out front. Its wasn't until MF teamed up with Quickie that they had a loader fit for purpose.
 

multi power

Member
Location
pembrokeshire
The problem with the Steelfab Massey loaders (80/880) was they were deigned for the attachment to fit between the arms but modern attachments got too big and ended up sticking 2 feet too far out pulling the hydraulic ram to bits. The 885 was beefed up and a contraption called a quick hitch was fitted but was still way out front. Its wasn't until MF teamed up with Quickie that they had a loader fit for purpose.
Definitely agree 80 is too long, first thing I did was shorten mine
 

Poleson

Member
Location
Shetland
The problem with the Steelfab Massey loaders (80/880) was they were deigned for the attachment to fit between the arms but modern attachments got too big and ended up sticking 2 feet too far out pulling the hydraulic ram to bits. The 885 was beefed up and a contraption called a quick hitch was fitted but was still way out front. Its wasn't until MF teamed up with Quickie that they had a loader fit for purpose.

Yes agree with that, it’s all too far away. Very clumsy and unstable when you have a bit of weight on and also puts a lot more strain on the front axle than would be with a proper loader. I tend to leave it off the tractor unless I really need it so I think if I had a less clumsy loader I’d leave it on more and it would be a lot more use to me.
 

multi power

Member
Location
pembrokeshire
If it is of any interest at all I have a 815 loader on mine with a Faucheux headstock.
IMG_20190307_115020192.jpg
IMG_20190307_114955584.jpg
like this ?
 

Ts 59

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Isle of Man
Think as you pull lever over to unlatch there's a lug on the back to keep it in open position until your hooked up. Then crowd right back and end of lever hits the little tang to push lever/lug out to let pins spring in. One of those things that might of briefly worked when new! We have a 390 , used to have a 880s on it , was worn out so bought an 815 boom thinking it would fit straight on. Front lugs are 4 inch wider so needed a bit of chop an weld. It's a much nicer loader though.
 

Dry Rot

Member
Livestock Farmer
Think as you pull lever over to unlatch there's a lug on the back to keep it in open position until your hooked up. Then crowd right back and end of lever hits the little tang to push lever/lug out to let pins spring in. One of those things that might of briefly worked when new! We have a 390 , used to have a 880s on it , was worn out so bought an 815 boom thinking it would fit straight on. Front lugs are 4 inch wider so needed a bit of chop an weld. It's a much nicer loader though.

Yes, that makes sense. The lever to pull the pins out can catch on that cross bar and break. I had to make a new one up. Good enough loader for my purposes, which are limited. I fitted an electric third service for the bale grab. My biggest grumble is putting the loader on and taking it off. Hate doing that!
 

6480

Member
The problem with the Steelfab Massey loaders (80/880) was they were deigned for the attachment to fit between the arms but modern attachments got too big and ended up sticking 2 feet too far out pulling the hydraulic ram to bits.
The 885 was beefed up and a contraption called a quick hitch was fitted but was still way out front. Its wasn't until MF teamed up with Quickie that they had a loader fit for purpose.

Never was a fan of them era of mf front loader s. They had no design at all just beefed up from the 80 from the 100 series Massey's. the quicke loader was of supeior design at the time. Can't understand why mf didn't offer the design of the mf 50 digger at the time for tractor s .it had a great design of a strong loader with self levelling and was used up til recent times on digger s
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 10 4.1%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 834
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top