jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
did you not read my earlier post ??
take a screen shot or photo of the figures and post it here job done ...
Metrichecking
- Thread starter Devon lad
- Start date
did you not read my earlier post ??
take a screen shot or photo of the figures and post it here job done ...
Clay52
Member
- Location
- Outer Space
Maybe i should. Do you?Ohhh, don't you get your vet to out the semen under a microscope before you start serving? I'm disappointed.
Not me personally, but considered it. On a recent trip to some Kay farms, it seemed common practice with some alarming results......
Clay52
Member
- Location
- Outer Space
That was the second one I had. A few years back I had another bull with 0% conception.
jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
You need to read some off your 206 emails.
jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
3 parts of them are amazon confirmations that are nowt to do with me (marriage for you)
the rest are harassment mail from twatter probably
the rest are harassment mail from twatter probably
jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
Jesus, how do you translate all that!
95%CI is the confidence rating of the results the higher the CI the more accurate they can be compared to each other
%CONC is conception rate
SPC is straws per conception
the rest is fairly straight forward
jimmer
Member
- Location
- East Devon
animals not pd'd yet or ones that didnt live to see a pd
- Location
- Pembrokeshire
You need to do some research just to translate that
- Location
- Pembrokeshire
FFS man you are so aggravating , i am trying to help you out a bit by trying to explain how these figures are achievable , the least you can do as at least give some kind of evidence to back up YOUR results
You guys don't seem to understand the scientific method. The published papers have much more weight as they are run with control groups under the same management. I can make up a nice screenshot of some lovely data, but its pretty meaningless.
Whether you want to believe him or not @Clay52 's claims are backed up by quite a lot of published evidence.
Quite happy to debate the cost, practicability, palatability of this but better in another thread.
- Location
- Pembrokeshire
We've asking to see @Clay52 figures ,we can all find research on google. I have very good conception rates and 6 wks in calf rates ,difference is I don't use any vet drugs to get this. My cows are the right condition score at calving ,this means they calve easily and get up and away quickly. I only serve for 10 wks so I cannot get it wrong , it's to costly
Cows 'n grass
Member
- Location
- Modbury, South Devon
Whether it's true or not or works or not, it's not a sustainable approach to breeding in this country. We are under constant attact from groups saying milk is full of hormones, chemicals and antibiotics and we need to be able to say that it's not true and push milk as a natural heathy drink.
Clay52
Member
- Location
- Outer Space
That's not the debate, people said the figures are not achievable when they clearly are. I've said before I'm planning on doing away with sync and put in plans to do so. Currently getting 60% conception on natural heats.
Clay52
Member
- Location
- Outer Space
I've taken a pic of the screen but it's much more fun holding out and seeing how entitled an opinion you have of yourself.
You seem to think if I don't prove it to you ( computer figures could be adjusted pretty quick anyway) that it effects my business or results in someway.
Last edited:
Cows 'n grass
Member
- Location
- Modbury, South Devon
What does it cost you in drugs this sync programme?
Not only do I not think syncing whole herds is unacceptable to the general public but if you're also still getting good standing heats without this and 60% conception rates then why do you bother? I just can't believe it's economically viable or worth it from a labour point of view if you're doing 5 injections.