sheepwise
Member
- Location
- SW Scotland
I had bloods taken from 6 stock blackface ewe lambs out of a batch of 100 which I felt were not thriving post weaning with some showing crusty ear symptoms.I specifically chose 6 of the poorest lambs for testing.
Several years ago we blood tested ewes to look for mineral problems but the results showed no deficiences whatsoever. However when we tested forage samples taken at random from the hill, selenium was shown to be very low. Ever since we have bolused the ewes twice yearly and the difference in their general health and performance has been phenomenal. I feel that our lambs do well up to shearing time in late July when they are given a mineral drench which seems to keep them going to weaning from when they start to suffer.My thinking was that while they were getting a good supply of milk from their bolused mothers they were doing well but then suffered as they became more dependant on grazing themselves.So I was seriously considering using a lamb bolus at shearing time in place of the drench to give supplementation beyond weaning. I thought that testing these 6 lambs was good practice to determine the actual deficiences to be able to give the most suitable bolus.Well got the blood results back from vet today and although 1 lamb tested low for selenium the other 5 showed good blood levels of all elements including cobalt and selenium so what should I do? From experience with the results from the ewes I'm thinking for next year I will do as I intended with the lambs and give them a selenium/cobalt bolus anyway and observe the results.Is it possible to have ill thriven stock due to dietary deficiency while still showing good blood mineral levels? I'm sure my vet told me years ago when we tested the ewes that the liver reserves could be very low despite bloods being normal.
Several years ago we blood tested ewes to look for mineral problems but the results showed no deficiences whatsoever. However when we tested forage samples taken at random from the hill, selenium was shown to be very low. Ever since we have bolused the ewes twice yearly and the difference in their general health and performance has been phenomenal. I feel that our lambs do well up to shearing time in late July when they are given a mineral drench which seems to keep them going to weaning from when they start to suffer.My thinking was that while they were getting a good supply of milk from their bolused mothers they were doing well but then suffered as they became more dependant on grazing themselves.So I was seriously considering using a lamb bolus at shearing time in place of the drench to give supplementation beyond weaning. I thought that testing these 6 lambs was good practice to determine the actual deficiences to be able to give the most suitable bolus.Well got the blood results back from vet today and although 1 lamb tested low for selenium the other 5 showed good blood levels of all elements including cobalt and selenium so what should I do? From experience with the results from the ewes I'm thinking for next year I will do as I intended with the lambs and give them a selenium/cobalt bolus anyway and observe the results.Is it possible to have ill thriven stock due to dietary deficiency while still showing good blood mineral levels? I'm sure my vet told me years ago when we tested the ewes that the liver reserves could be very low despite bloods being normal.