Monbiot's TV show.....Apocalypse Cow: How Meat Killed the Planet

Pilatus

Member
Location
cotswolds
I have just Googled "Why I gave up Veganism",some interesting bits and pieces,so lets hope many that give veganism a try will gradually come to their senses and go back to a traditional diet,which may mean eating less meat but not an all out ban on eating it. As the old saying says everything in moderation .
 

egbert

Member
Livestock Farmer
Timber plantations are less efficient than a mixed grass clover ley at sequestering soil carbon. The net effect of trees planted in grassland in minus 100 kg/ha ((Guo & Gifford 2002). The biomass sequesters around 48 t/ha over 20 years but that is either harvested, processed or falls over & is ultimately released into the atmosphere again. Willow coppice & energy grasses have the bulkiest root systems capable of sequestering 1.1 t/ha of soil carbon over 4 years.

To be clear, i am not advocating widescale planting of farmable land (we simply don't have enough)

But you say it in your first line 'sequestering soil carbon'.
The beauty of trees for carbon capture is that it's available to take straight off, and remove...freeing up the land for the next go. (and I know...what do you do with the timber?)
And a lot of sites/systems would be capable of doing a lot more than 48T/hct in 20 years.
Over centuries, the accumulated carbon stored in soil would make it hugely unstable - if it were possible to keep adding to it continually, which doesn't seem to be the case.

I realise many peeps have their own theory/favoured route, but I'm looking around me in widening circles, and cannot see much option for capturing/storing the carbon we're releasing, when we pump/dig millions of tonnes of concentrated fossilised carbon outta the ground, and burn it.
Piledriving sitka/eucalypt trunks back into the sea bed is my best shot.

As for long term/large scale storage in soil...will someone show me where it happens without our help.
Cos I've walked along the gutters through tropical rainforest, arboreal forest, mountain ranges, continental prairies, deserts, tundra, and everything short of seldom find topsoil deeper than a foot.
Soaked living peatbog is an exception, alluvial deposits don't count, and I don't understand what 'volcanic soil' means, although i had a cousin tilling 4' of it in queensland backalong.
Someone show me.
 

unlacedgecko

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Fife

What an annoying plonker! Well done rachel for keeping calm and composed. Dont think i could of

I still can't understand why a violent drug dealer and gang member with a conviction for firearms offences was given a visa for the UK.

 

Wolds Beef

Member
Cummins is a Farmers Son. Maybe he ought to start his cull in DEFRA and associated organisations!! Why does our Government not stop supporting countries that grow tobacco and other associated products for a start and Publicly state that what comes in to this country below our standards will be destroyed. And they need to prove that standard with paperwork!!
WB
 

Dave6170

Member

AT Aloss

Member
NFFN Member
To be clear, i am not advocating widescale planting of farmable land (we simply don't have enough)

But you say it in your first line 'sequestering soil carbon'.
The beauty of trees for carbon capture is that it's available to take straight off, and remove...freeing up the land for the next go. (and I know...what do you do with the timber?)
And a lot of sites/systems would be capable of doing a lot more than 48T/hct in 20 years.
Over centuries, the accumulated carbon stored in soil would make it hugely unstable - if it were possible to keep adding to it continually, which doesn't seem to be the case.

I realise many peeps have their own theory/favoured route, but I'm looking around me in widening circles, and cannot see much option for capturing/storing the carbon we're releasing, when we pump/dig millions of tonnes of concentrated fossilised carbon outta the ground, and burn it.
Piledriving sitka/eucalypt trunks back into the sea bed is my best shot.

As for long term/large scale storage in soil...will someone show me where it happens without our help.
Cos I've walked along the gutters through tropical rainforest, arboreal forest, mountain ranges, continental prairies, deserts, tundra, and everything short of seldom find topsoil deeper than a foot.
Soaked living peatbog is an exception, alluvial deposits don't count, and I don't understand what 'volcanic soil' means, although i had a cousin tilling 4' of it in queensland backalong.
Someone show me.
All the carbon calculations in the document I've quoted (which was prepared for UK Government & related to different biomass products for renewable energy) have been adjusted for +/- existing land use, establishment/harvesting/processing & transportation system. These adjustments are made for both the carbon in the biomass & the carbon sequestered in the soil.

Increasing soil carbon deposits depends on the Cabron:Nitrogen ratio of the soil (as well as the root mass in the soil), and both elements are in abundance in our atmosphere.

If you walk the land with a soil biologist & dig some soil pits, I'm sure they'd be pleased to show you some soil carbon.
 

Poorbuthappy

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
To be clear, i am not advocating widescale planting of farmable land (we simply don't have enough)

But you say it in your first line 'sequestering soil carbon'.
The beauty of trees for carbon capture is that it's available to take straight off, and remove...freeing up the land for the next go. (and I know...what do you do with the timber?)
And a lot of sites/systems would be capable of doing a lot more than 48T/hct in 20 years.
Over centuries, the accumulated carbon stored in soil would make it hugely unstable - if it were possible to keep adding to it continually, which doesn't seem to be the case.

I realise many peeps have their own theory/favoured route, but I'm looking around me in widening circles, and cannot see much option for capturing/storing the carbon we're releasing, when we pump/dig millions of tonnes of concentrated fossilised carbon outta the ground, and burn it.
Piledriving sitka/eucalypt trunks back into the sea bed is my best shot.

As for long term/large scale storage in soil...will someone show me where it happens without our help.
Cos I've walked along the gutters through tropical rainforest, arboreal forest, mountain ranges, continental prairies, deserts, tundra, and everything short of seldom find topsoil deeper than a foot.
Soaked living peatbog is an exception, alluvial deposits don't count, and I don't understand what 'volcanic soil' means, although i had a cousin tilling 4' of it in queensland backalong.
Someone show me.
So you're accounting for the above ground sequestration of carbon in the growing tree.
Fair enough.
What about the above ground sequestration of carbon in the pasture and the livestock?
A breeding flock/ herd is a fair bit of carbon locked up long term, but with a positive use of actually producing food.

Where can long term storage happen in the soil without our help? How do you think the metres deep soils of Australia, USA, and Africa formed? We didn't do it.
But we can emulate it to do it again whilst producing food. I seem to remember a certain article saying we'd need to plant more area to trees than we have in this country to offset our carbon emissions. Where's our food coming from then?
At least with regenerative farming food is produced as well as offsetting some of these emissions.
And yes the root problem of fossil fuel use has to be addressed.
 

gatepost

Member
Location
Cotswolds
This whole debate reminds me of the Brexit thing. Find a simplified solution to a complex problem. Blame all the ills of the country on the EU, Eurocrats, immigrants and so on, get a catchy slogan and keep repeating it until it is no longer challenged.

Climate change is real. Anthropomorphic CO2 is real. But rather than look at globalisation, consumerism and our “disposable” lifestyles, pick on farmers, better still, pick on cows. Keep repeating the lie until everyone stops questioning it and it becomes ‘truth’. Easier to blame cows than look at your own relentless contribution to climate chaos, the cars, the latest devices, the central heating and air conditioning, the all year round strawberries, the cheap plentiful food, disposable everything, keeping up with the Joneses etc etc.



Monbiot is a clever bloke, dangerous, but clever.

Mosn over, sorry.
You can include Blair and WMD in that
 

Pilatus

Member
Location
cotswolds
I still can't understand why a violent drug dealer and gang member with a conviction for firearms offences was given a visa for the UK.

A couple of years ago after his outbursts on tv while being interviewed,he was turned away from the uk, so I don’t know why he was allowed in this time,perhaps the security system slipped up and let him in by accident.
 

Muck Spreader

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin
Cummins is a Farmers Son. Maybe he ought to start his cull in DEFRA and associated organisations!! Why does our Government not stop supporting countries that grow tobacco and other associated products for a start and Publicly state that what comes in to this country below our standards will be destroyed. And they need to prove that standard with paperwork!!
WB

A bit of an exaggeration to say he is a farmers son. His parents bought a hobby farm when his father retired from the oil industry. Otherwise he is the normal public school Oxbridge educated political elite product. Interestingly he does have a connection to the Chillingham cattle via his wife, who is a daughter of Sir Humphry Wakefield owner of Chillinghan castle.
 

CornishTone

Member
BASIS
Location
Cornwall
A couple of years ago after his outbursts on tv while being interviewed,he was turned away from the uk, so I don’t know why he was allowed in this time,perhaps the security system slipped up and let him in by accident.

Australia decided they’d had enough of him and wouldn’t take the prîck back, so he had to go somewhere.

Aren’t we the lucky ones!
 

Muck Spreader

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin
851785


Courtesy of Gareth Wyn Jones
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 104 40.6%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.2%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,526
  • 28
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top