- Location
- East Yorkshire
You’ve lost me, but I admit to being thick.?Boundaries for you in the next couple of days, eh?
You’ve lost me, but I admit to being thick.?Boundaries for you in the next couple of days, eh?
Soya is the only compleat plant protein, so if you are not eating meat, its the best thing to eat, its easily made in to a mince subitute,and its cheap TVP. 500g could feed a family of four at least three meals. Its been around for years. If people were really interested in veganism sales would go up.Just because we can feed it to cattle doesn't mean we have to. Or that we should pay for it.
I just find it a difficult argument to make that it's not farmings fault it's humans fault, like we aren't human or we don't contribute in any way. just because its not frown specifically for animal food doesnt mean that we dont benefit from it being grown.
As an aside palm oil is more land efficient than soya so replacing it with that a arguably a good thing
won't open for meSorry to bang on about it but I’ve been cross about this all day
the area of land above the TreeLine is called Montane
This is an excellent scientific paper all about it in the UK from Natural England
Print it out and use it to counter the “plant trees in the uplands” vegan arguement
and now thisJust noticed the program that is due to be broadcast directly before Monbiot’s effort.
Does not look like that will be worth watching either.
C4 looks as if they have a definite agenda...
View attachment 852140
Sorry to bang on about it but I’ve been cross about this all day
the area of land above the TreeLine is called Montane
This is an excellent scientific paper all about it in the UK from Natural England
Print it out and use it to counter the “plant trees in the uplands” vegan arguement
You’ve lost me, but I admit to being thick.?
Agree that livestock are excellent converters of low feed value products into tasty deliciousnessObviously the livestock industry utilises the soyabean meal (oil removed), but I would have thought that was a good use for it - turning a byproduct into food.
It could be eaten directly by humans I suppose, but humans don't seem to want to eat all that is available after the oil extraction process.
Don't see many people wanting to munch on palm kernal, rapeseed meal or sunflower hulls either.
I do take your point, but personally think that it is a good news livestock story.
Cracking idea!Rather than complain to C4 and be fobbed of why not make a note of the companies whose advertisements run before, during and after the programme and point out that they are supporting propaganda that means you and yours wint be buying their products. If enough do it and advertisers withdraw from C4 they are finished.
Why do they need 'finish' if the entire carcase gets put through a mincer and sold as lean mince?That's when it gets complicated, the dairy boys are being discouraged from killing bull calves but B&W bulls can only be effectively finished on a grain based diet.
time to get the ASA on the case
I think we'll be fine for water - the H will end up finding an O to buddy up with eventually. The real question is where the hell all the energy will come from to split the water up into its component elements in the first place. Splitting up stable molecules is hard work.Here’s a thought. Monbiot said you use energy to split a water molecule to produce hydrogen to make this new super food.
there is a finite amount of water on the planet. It’s recycled through the water cycle. It’s not made.
Therefore if we split the water molecule to make food like Monbiot wants then we will run out of water eventually ???
and probably die from Oxygen poisoning as the O from the split molecule will go into the atmosphere upsetting the ratio of O in the air
just thinking out loud really and happy to be proved wrong. I’m a farmer not a scientist