primmiemoo
Member
- Location
- Devon
It won't be Royal, but it would represent our group of Nations.
It won't be Royal, but it would represent our group of Nations.
To be used to project the Nation’s image abroad, according to the media. One can only imagine how better the Australian trade deal could have been had Liz Truss had a yacht available during the negotiations.
I used to think that yachts were vessels that had sails and everything else were either boats or ships. Perfectly logical but no, it's not as simple as that.
Do you seriously think her majesty wishes at 95 to spend the remainder of her days floating round on some plastic gin palace which will mean precisely nothing to her. The only person with any interest in using it will be Bozza, as it will go along with the two jets he has already saddled on the taxpayer. The country and the world has moved on since the days of royal yachts and visiting the outpost of Empire. If we need to host trade exhibitions there are 2 aircraft carriers with massive enclosed spaces that can be used.
You miss the point I think it could be a technological marvel they create as an advert for British led engineering not just a boat
To be used to project the Nation’s image abroad, according to the media. One can only imagine how better the Australian trade deal could have been had Liz Truss had a yacht available during the negotiations.
Humm, you mean a ship with several large cracks in it's hull?It won't be Royal, but it would represent our group of Nations.
Just reading between the lines here, I take it you’re no fan of Boris?
Presumably you get round that by officially classifying it as a warship? In theory Britannia was a hospital ship?I notice that last October whizz trade negotiator Liz Truss foolishly signed a WTO global procurement agreement which allows any country to tender for all UK shipbuilding projects except warships. Most developed countries hold all shipbuilding in reserve. So building a Royal Yacht could be good news for South Korea.
Yacht….a hole in the water that you throw money into.Boat = neutrally buoyant (aka submarine); ship = surface vessel.
Civilian shipbuilding not excluded from contracts that must be opened to global competition
Royal yacht or Bozo's plaything, seems power has gone to his head?See today costings have already gone up 50 million
Ben Wallace said
Britain’s new royal yacht could cost the taxpayer an initial £50m more than previously indicated at a total cost of £250m, the defence secretary said at an industry event to launch the project.
More likely to be a ferry service instead of the RNLIThis proposal shouldn't hold water.
Could patrol the Channel I suppose, keep Johnny Foreigner at bay..