New Zealand

Just watched this reported on BBC Breakfast. Funny they didn't mention that the cases came from the UK in spite of it being on their own website.


Heathrow to Doha = 6hr 55 mins.
Doha to Brisbane 13 hr 50 mins.
Brisbane to Auckland 3 hr 15 mins.
Plus probably between 2 and 4 hours at each transit stop, so around 30 hours of travelling time arriving at the Auckland quarantine site on June 7th.
Reportedly it CV-19 takes 5 days to develop so that fits with becoming infected on the flights.

Had the NZ testing procedures been followed to the letter then these cases would have been identified within the quarantine hotel in Auckland before the women travelled (self drive) to a relatives house in Wellington where they where they had a compassionate exemption to visit a dying relative. They were too late and are now self isolating for a further 14 days in Wellington as is their relative. The funeral is being delayed so that they can all attend after the quarantine period and further testing.
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
Heathrow to Doha = 6hr 55 mins.
Doha to Brisbane 13 hr 50 mins.
Brisbane to Auckland 3 hr 15 mins.
Plus probably between 2 and 4 hours at each transit stop, so around 30 hours of travelling time arriving at the Auckland quarantine site on June 7th.
Reportedly it CV-19 takes 5 days to develop so that fits with becoming infected on the flights.

Had the NZ testing procedures been followed to the letter then these cases would have been identified within the quarantine hotel in Auckland before the women travelled (self drive) to a relatives house in Wellington where they where they had a compassionate exemption to visit a dying relative. They were too late and are now self isolating for a further 14 days in Wellington as is their relative. The funeral is being delayed so that they can all attend after the quarantine period and further testing.
That has now been proven and Jacinda has admitted that procedures were not followed. I have heard of two cases recently where people have tested positive and the next day negative followed by another negative. I can understand how you can get a false negative but how do you get a false positive unless the test is extremely unreliable?
 

czechmate

Member
Mixed Farmer
That has now been proven and Jacinda has admitted that procedures were not followed. I have heard of two cases recently where people have tested positive and the next day negative followed by another negative. I can understand how you can get a false negative but how do you get a false positive unless the test is extremely unreliable?


Seems a right cock up with these two ladies.
That’s the problem when you start getting soft ?‍♂️
 

RushesToo

Member
Location
Fingringhoe
That has now been proven and Jacinda has admitted that procedures were not followed. I have heard of two cases recently where people have tested positive and the next day negative followed by another negative. I can understand how you can get a false negative but how do you get a false positive unless the test is extremely unreliable?
It is imprecise - all tests fail an amount positive and negative. This is just how it is.

When you have a lot of infection you tolerate tests saying that you are negative. Because you know a lot of people are infected you want to get *most* out but can let a few slip through
When infection is low, you tolerate tests that fail saying more are postive. You want to catch everyone infected and accept a few more.
You use different tests for different times

You also have to take into account the cost of tests - everyone wants a test that is always accurate AND costs the least - mostly it doesn't work like that.

Sadly it isn't simple.
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
Military is now going to oversee quarantine procedures.

Gives the government someone else to blame when it goes wrong and they can bypass a few regulations that might hinder them.
I believe they did a similar thing with the White island eruption search, sign it over to the military then if it goes sideways its on them.

The election cant come soon enough for Labour, people are starting to get on their case.
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
It is imprecise - all tests fail an amount positive and negative. This is just how it is.

When you have a lot of infection you tolerate tests saying that you are negative. Because you know a lot of people are infected you want to get *most* out but can let a few slip through
When infection is low, you tolerate tests that fail saying more are postive. You want to catch everyone infected and accept a few more.
You use different tests for different times

You also have to take into account the cost of tests - everyone wants a test that is always accurate AND costs the least - mostly it doesn't work like that.

Sadly it isn't simple.
I think I understand what you are saying but I am still not sure how you can have a test that finds the presence of something that is not actually there. One example is a friend who has been on and off having cancer treatment for a few years. He was diagnosed as having a relapse early in the year and commenced new treatment. Just before a new wave of treatment was due to commence he was diagnosed positive and treatment was cancelled. A follow up test a few days later showed negative and this was reinforced by another negative but he was still sent home to isolate. I think this interrupted the course of treatment and it had to restart from the beginning two weeks later. This was bad for him and bad for the health service. If the tests are unreliable why did they base the original decision to cancel treatment based on just one test?
I get this information from his wife who is an ex nurse. She is obviously very upset but I don`t think she is overplaying the situation.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
I think I understand what you are saying but I am still not sure how you can have a test that finds the presence of something that is not actually there. One example is a friend who has been on and off having cancer treatment for a few years. He was diagnosed as having a relapse early in the year and commenced new treatment. Just before a new wave of treatment was due to commence he was diagnosed positive and treatment was cancelled. A follow up test a few days later showed negative and this was reinforced by another negative but he was still sent home to isolate. I think this interrupted the course of treatment and it had to restart from the beginning two weeks later. This was bad for him and bad for the health service. If the tests are unreliable why did they base the original decision to cancel treatment based on just one test?
I get this information from his wife who is an ex nurse. She is obviously very upset but I don`t think she is overplaying the situation.
Medical tests rarely test what they are actually trying to determine. Most of them test for something that Indicates what they are looking for. With Covid 19 the test looks for antibodies to the virus, not the virus itself. Different tests may find it hard to differentiate between Covid 19 antibodies and those to other similar viruses.

Also you may have the virus but be too early to have developed the antibodies and people vary in how quickly and how well they develop those antibodies.

Very few medical tests are 100% accurate.
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
Medical tests rarely test what they are actually trying to determine. Most of them test for something that Indicates what they are looking for. With Covid 19 the test looks for antibodies to the virus, not the virus itself. Different tests may find it hard to differentiate between Covid 19 antibodies and those to other similar viruses.

Also you may have the virus but be too early to have developed the antibodies and people vary in how quickly and how well they develop those antibodies.

Very few medical tests are 100% accurate.
OK, nothing is infallible. So this is an antibody test that finds antibodies one day but they have disappeared the next . I understand that the difficulty in exactly identifying antibodies may cause confusion but by the same token do all these asymptomatic carriers really exist or are they at least to a great extent the result of unreliable tests. The other problem that occurs to me, if antibody identification is so unreliable the production of a reliable vaccine is also very hit and miss.
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
Gives the government someone else to blame when it goes wrong and they can bypass a few regulations that might hinder them.
I believe they did a similar thing with the White island eruption search, sign it over to the military then if it goes sideways its on them.

The election cant come soon enough for Labour, people are starting to get on their case.
All governments have to delegate. Jacinda cannot personally supervise volcanoes and all aspects of quarantining incomers. In this case the blame must lie with some person or persons not doing their job but if the government have not delegated correctly then it is a failure of the government. Delegating responsibility to the military is utilising a body of public servants who are probably underutilised anyway, who theoretically are well organised and well disciplined. Not a bad plan I think.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
All governments have to delegate. Jacinda cannot personally supervise volcanoes and all aspects of quarantining incomers. In this case the blame must lie with some person or persons not doing their job but if the government have not delegated correctly then it is a failure of the government. Delegating responsibility to the military is utilising a body of public servants who are probably underutilised anyway, who theoretically are well organised and well disciplined. Not a bad plan I think.
Surely, in the middle of the biggest crisis in modern times that had just tanked the economy, the relevant minister would stay "on top of their brief" though?
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
Surely, in the middle of the biggest crisis in modern times that had just tanked the economy, the relevant minister would stay "on top of their brief" though?
Yes, I know you cannot blame Jacinda but at the same time the relevant minister is next in line which increases the focus but he/she would not be on the front line either. I suppose you would call it a national security issue and that department has failed. Why not involve the military therefore.
I can see why the government has failed because it has been let down but by strengthening the security I see no hint of a cop out.
 

Exfarmer

Member
Location
Bury St Edmunds
Medical tests rarely test what they are actually trying to determine. Most of them test for something that Indicates what they are looking for. With Covid 19 the test looks for antibodies to the virus, not the virus itself. Different tests may find it hard to differentiate between Covid 19 antibodies and those to other similar viruses.

Also you may have the virus but be too early to have developed the antibodies and people vary in how quickly and how well they develop those antibodies.

Very few medical tests are 100% accurate.
This is not correct. There are two Covid tests, one is an anti body test which reveals if you have had the disease and often will not give a very accurate result for 2-3 weeks after you recover. this test is a blood test.
Theo there test which is far more widely used it looking for the virus by means of a swab test of the nose and throat. It is possible to find traces of the virus without infection if you have been in close proximity to a sufferer, just as they have found traces in pets. It does not mean 100% certain, that you have the disease but is a pretty good indicator. looking for anti bodies in the nose would be a waste of time as they live in the bloodstream
 

arcobob

Member
Location
Norfolk
This is not correct. There are two Covid tests, one is an anti body test which reveals if you have had the disease and often will not give a very accurate result for 2-3 weeks after you recover. this test is a blood test.
Theo there test which is far more widely used it looking for the virus by means of a swab test of the nose and throat. It is possible to find traces of the virus without infection if you have been in close proximity to a sufferer, just as they have found traces in pets. It does not mean 100% certain, that you have the disease but is a pretty good indicator. looking for anti bodies in the nose would be a waste of time as they live in the bloodstream
That is far more plausible. The worrying thing is the virus is widespread and with social distancing it is possible to get a non viable load without getting the disease. Any relaxation will surely increase the incidences of full blown infection.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
This is not correct. There are two Covid tests, one is an anti body test which reveals if you have had the disease and often will not give a very accurate result for 2-3 weeks after you recover. this test is a blood test.
Theo there test which is far more widely used it looking for the virus by means of a swab test of the nose and throat. It is possible to find traces of the virus without infection if you have been in close proximity to a sufferer, just as they have found traces in pets. It does not mean 100% certain, that you have the disease but is a pretty good indicator. looking for anti bodies in the nose would be a waste of time as they live in the bloodstream

Agreed. It was a simplification. There is debate about how much "viral load" it takes to create infection, something which almost certainly varies between individuals. All these factors make the results of any testing less than certain.

The issue around tests measuring an indicator, not the thing you are looking for, is common in medicine. Testing for cholesterol to measure heart risk is a quite weak one too especially as the understanding of cholesterol is changing. There are many other examples as well.

That is far more plausible. The worrying thing is the virus is widespread and with social distancing it is possible to get a non viable load without getting the disease. Any relaxation will surely increase the incidences of full blown infection.

We know so little about this virus yet that much of the guidance is educated conjecture. We are all learning as we go along. The fact remains though that I'd expect the health Minister in a country as small (in population) as New Zealand to be very closely involved in any exceptions to the policy in place at this very early stage of opening up to visitors.

Sadly politicians taking personal responsibility for failures has become the rare exception these days.
 

czechmate

Member
Mixed Farmer
That is far more plausible. The worrying thing is the virus is widespread and with social distancing it is possible to get a non viable load without getting the disease. Any relaxation will surely increase the incidences of full blown infection.


It feels to me, a bit like the calm before the storm. I hope I’m wrong.
Or ww2 theme, the phoney war...
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
I've been waiting for this story to pop up.
Upcoming driver shortage.




Another contactor complaining about no staff.


They don't help themselves sometimes. Comments like new people would have to spend 2 months with another driver. Really?
Are the Irish drivers he usually gets really "specialist Ag drivers" or just keen lads that are cheap.
There's plenty of operators in NZ that would do the job if it was made more attractive.
Lines like we want to have people allowed in until we train kiwis sound good but they're not going to do it.
Maybe these places should put more effort into creating full time roles or annualised hours etc. After all they expect people to drive gear "valued between $500,000 and $1 million.
 
Another contactor complaining about no staff.


They don't help themselves sometimes. Comments like new people would have to spend 2 months with another driver. Really?
Are the Irish drivers he usually gets really "specialist Ag drivers" or just keen lads that are cheap.
There's plenty of operators in NZ that would do the job if it was made more attractive.
Lines like we want to have people allowed in until we train kiwis sound good but they're not going to do it.
Maybe these places should put more effort into creating full time roles or annualised hours etc. After all they expect people to drive gear "valued between $500,000 and $1 million.

In that situation, the thing to do would be fly in the people you want, swab test (PCR) them, obtain the results within 48 hours (as happens in the UK) and you will know if they have the virus or not with about as accurate a picture as you are going to get.
 

stewart

Member
Horticulture
Location
Bay of Plenty NZ
In that situation, the thing to do would be fly in the people you want, swab test (PCR) them, obtain the results within 48 hours (as happens in the UK) and you will know if they have the virus or not with about as accurate a picture as you are going to get.
That all sounds well and good in theory, however NZ regulations are a lot stricter that the UKs, it is two weeks mandatory managed isolation, effectively you are locked in a hotel room for two weeks, swabs and testing are done at 3 days and again at 11, if it is a positive test then you are moved to another isolation centre where the positive cases are kept.
A single test done when people fly in is not accurate enough, I also don't think anyone is allowed in the country unless they have a Kiwi passport or are a permanent resident.
Labour has been a real problem for several years and is not going to get any better for quite some time.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 101 41.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 89 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.8%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 10 4.1%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 469
  • 0
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Crypto Hunter and Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Crypto Hunter have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into...
Top