North country cheviot

Not having a go at you Nithy, but I've never understood with this attitude that we should all agree with the judge. I've seen some judges make bizarre decisions and I've seen the ringside buyers spend big money on some inexplicable stock. We all think differently and it's just as well we do. I wouldn't think any the less of his decision without seeing the evidence for myself.

Myself, I almost never agree with the kind of animals that go on to sell at a huge trade - they're usually not my kind of thing, but other people value them highly , therefore, if I were ever to judge anything, realistically, I'd expect my decision to be "controversial. "

Ie, it wouldn't chime in with those who splash a lot of cash.

It still wouldn't change my mind and I'd still think I was right. :)
I rarely agree with a judge, and I don't pay any attention to rosettes.

I think pre-sale shows are just a distraction.
 

Nithsdale

Member
Livestock Farmer
Not having a go at you Nithy, but I've never understood with this attitude that we should all agree with the judge. I've seen some judges make bizarre decisions and I've seen the ringside buyers spend big money on some inexplicable stock. We all think differently and it's just as well we do. I wouldn't think any the less of his decision without seeing the evidence for myself.

Myself, I almost never agree with the kind of animals that go on to sell at a huge trade - they're usually not my kind of thing, but other people value them highly , therefore, if I were ever to judge anything, realistically, I'd expect my decision to be "controversial. "

Ie, it wouldn't chime in with those who splash a lot of cash.

It still wouldn't change my mind and I'd still think I was right. :)


Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. I didn't mean it to sound like I was having a go :oops:
Ofcourse the judge is just a person, and it quite often comes down to personal choice/preference - and that is perfectly fine. It's also fine for the chosen champion animal/pen not to make the top price. That happens quite often...

But I was/am quite surprised at the vast difference in price between the champion and the top price, that's all. Obviously more people disagreed with his choice, then agreed with it.
 
Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. I didn't mean it to sound like I was having a go :oops:
Ofcourse the judge is just a person, and it quite often comes down to personal choice/preference - and that is perfectly fine. It's also fine for the chosen champion animal/pen not to make the top price. That happens quite often...

But I was/am quite surprised at the vast difference in price between the champion and the top price, that's all. Obviously more people disagreed with his choice, then agreed with it.
It doesn't matter. It's all hugely subjective. Some years ago I saw 20000 guineas get spent on a bull that most people that I talked to described as anything between pretty average to dreadful. The cash sum involved is meaningless.

I always remember a great quote from a racehorse trainer from many years back about the misty Autumn morning he took a walk round Newmarket Sales Paddocks and he took a liking he couldn't explain to a small , slightly weedy colt that had more winners in his background pedigree than power and scope in his underdeveloped frame.

"who could have foretold that long gone morning that this , above all other more impressive looking colts on that day , would be the Prince that would sire a Dynasty?"

That for me says it all.
 

Top Tip.

Member
Location
highland
It doesn't matter. It's all hugely subjective. Some years ago I saw 20000 guineas get spent on a bull that most people that I talked to described as anything between pretty average to dreadful. The cash sum involved is meaningless.

I always remember a great quote from a racehorse trainer from many years back about the misty Autumn morning he took a walk round Newmarket Sales Paddocks and he took a liking he couldn't explain to a small , slightly weedy colt that had more winners in his background pedigree than power and scope in his underdeveloped frame.

"who could have foretold that long gone morning that this , above all other more impressive looking colts on that day , would be the Prince that would sire a Dynasty?"

That for me says it all.
That is breeding animals in a nutshell.
 
Sorry, that wasn't really what I meant. I didn't mean it to sound like I was having a go :oops:
Ofcourse the judge is just a person, and it quite often comes down to personal choice/preference - and that is perfectly fine. It's also fine for the chosen champion animal/pen not to make the top price. That happens quite often...

But I was/am quite surprised at the vast difference in price between the champion and the top price, that's all. Obviously more people disagreed with his choice, then agreed with it.

The judge can only judge what he likes, and if his choice is different from others, that's though sxit! He would not be doing his job if he was trying to judge what others might like!

I take my hat off to anybody who steps up and judges big classes of sheep in front of a ring side packed with experts!!
 
The judge can only judge what he likes, and if his choice is different from others, that's though sxit! He would not be doing his job if he was trying to judge what others might like!
Absolutely nailed it in one @west coast angus !!!(y)

I had a very disappointing conversation some years ago with the wife of a then famous sheep farmer who was asked at the time to judge a lot of shows. She remarked to me how annoyed she got at her husband watching him judge , for she knew he wasn't judging to his true beliefs , but was putting up sheep from well known breeders that would be popular choices with other "faces" on the circuit.

I felt bitterly let down to hear this , for I had always looked up to this guy. I considered him professional , hard working and a damn good stockman.

Here's the thing. He was a commercial farmer who through his own skill , brainpower , and hard work , had earned himself the right to be considered a man worth consulting on the merits of his breed. He had risen to the top of the trade in his breed through nothing more than supplying the market with a consistently higher quality than anyone else in his field , and by finding a place in the market that he could do better than anyone else.

So , he'd earned the right to express his opinion and give of his own thoughts.

So why didn't he? Why didn't he give opinions that were true to his core beliefs? After all those years of hard work and putting something together that other people couldn't , why didn't he just say it as he saw it and bugger what everyone thought?

No , a judge needs to be truthful , especially to himself. He has to judge them as he see's them , for what else can he do?

How much money others spend on sheep that he considers to be not as good should not come into it , and it really doesn't matter a damn.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 103 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.3%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,468
  • 28
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top