Steevo
Member
- Location
- Gloucestershire
25 tonnes seems a strange figure. 24 tonnes being obviously not too dangerous
From now on I shall refer to this as the “Rule of 25”.
Can we store more outdoors than in..? How about over Christmas?
25 tonnes seems a strange figure. 24 tonnes being obviously not too dangerous
This may not quite be what answers your above but there is n NSF Farm Records Book (can be got in a word document so you can fill it in) lots of templates that helped me with my audit, one additional on the fert is that one should update the record at least every 3 months could have been a red mark but managed to see the need before auditor attended t visually inspect Fert, Chem, Grain store.Why don't RT put their short arms in their deep pockets and put a simple webform tool on their website that enables us, their CLIENTS, to submit these notification to the appropriate place in the appropriate format....
We just put a wall of round bales round the heap no issues or questions moved them after . filed the del . note after the visit .I was pulled up by my Red Tractor inspector for this - not notifying the HSE and local Fire & Rescue Service about >25t of AN fertiliser in a building. I had got a bit behind, having only handled liquid fertiliser for years with no such requirements.
Writing a letter to the FRS is easy enough & I have the details for them. Who else? The HSE guidance just says the "enforcing authority" without any detail on who this might be! Any tips please?
Who actually does this notification, out of interest? I've always notified the FRS in the past but that's it.
This may not quite be what answers your above but there is n NSF Farm Records Book (can be got in a word document so you can fill it in) lots of templates that helped me with my audit, one additional on the fert is that one should update the record at least every 3 months could have been a red mark but managed to see the need before auditor attended t visually inspect Fert, Chem, Grain store.
If it was 30 all the farms who have a load at a time would fall outside the scope and that would surely be helpful, oh wait they do it to be awkward....25 tonnes seems a strange figure. 24 tonnes being obviously not too dangerous
If it was 30 all the farms who have a load at a time would fall outside the scope and that would surely be helpful, oh wait they do it to be awkward....
From now on I shall refer to this as the “Rule of 25”.
Can we store more outdoors than in..? How about over Christmas?
after seeing a spud box full of fresh cut logs next to my stack of fert in the back of the shed my red tractor inspector said i wasnt allowed to store anything flammable next to the fertiliser and should move it asap!!We just put a wall of round bales round the heap no issues or questions moved them after . filed the del . note after the visit .
what a wonderful thread to demonstrate the utterly pointless nature of Red Tractor this is
examples of authorities not wanting to be informed, inspectors offering routes around the requirement and others with assurance seemingly not even knowing they should be doing this plus a genius idea that 24t is safe but 25t isn’t ! and fudging none compliance with statements that promise to do it in the future but never actually do so
pointless protection racket thats costing us all money ... why ?
Clive, this has nothing to do with RT, other than them wanting to confirm that the farmers they are auditing are complying with the law - which is the bare minimum they should do.
The law is clear: We need to inform HSE, in writing and using a specific form to specific addresses, if we store more than the threshold of certain products. We also need to tell the local Fire Brigade. If people aren't competent to check the rules and follow the fairly easy steps, do you think they should be trusted to hold large quantities of explosive materials?
this thread is about Red Tractor and their checking
as you point out their input is not needed here as like LAW is setting the standards
so what are we paying them for ? and what are they offering our customers?
it is a NFU backed protection racket
Don't worry, as soon as they realise, they will ban ammonium nitrate as well as urea. Should be easy enough to import food into the UK as soon as border controls are sorted.Am I reading that right?
Surely if someone needs to tick box 9, they've already done what they needed by virtue of having ticked box 10.
P.S All urea here so never give this a second thought nowadays.
P.P.S I'm totally bemused by those in power wanting to ban Urea, when it means that all 15,000 farms in the UK will then become potential bomb sites. I'm sure the locals in every village would be flabbergasted if they knew that an explosion of one hundredth the size of Beirut explosion could take place in several places all less than 2 miles from their front door and would much prefer all farms in UK only used non-explosive fertiliser.
They are, in fact, exactly the same product. Hopefully the stuff we have is not partially degraded but the way some farmers keep bags out in the rain for days before putting it into store, if they ever bother, makes me wonder.Wasn’t the AN stored in Beirut explosive grade product, and partially degraded, rather than what we all sit on in our fertiliser stores?
I really don’t think it would be helpful for Joe Public to make the mistake of thinking they are the same thing.
but it is, basically. It is highly explosive, although it needs a catalyst (but I seem to recall it was a fireworks factory fire that sent the Beirut lot up). One of my family members, who stores a large volume for their arable acreage, was asked by the Met if they could visit his store as part of anti-terrorism training.
Seem to recall when we phoned our local fire service (We rarely have > 25t AN but we did one year) they were very pleased and said most farmers don't bother. )
Why is it not normal for fire service to assume that a farm will have AN in storage plus large quantities of diesel fuel? That would save a whole lot of box filling rollocks.