Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Opinion Harvester Survey - Red Tractor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treg" data-source="post: 8202056" data-attributes="member: 42292"><p>If we had more assurance schemes Standard RT , RT , RT Gold would that create competition?</p><p>Or have we already got them RT, Pasture for life & Organic etc</p><p>Did M& S assurance once that was nice very practical BUT on top of RT , so had to be RT assured to get M&S assurance on top .</p><p>So would we better off leaving it to retailers? If they want to sell a product with a higher assurance then they inspect the farm to their standards?</p><p>Where does that leave those of us that supply multiple retailers? They'll probably want different things so multiple paperwork? </p><p>Which is why RT was created to save multiple inspections .</p><p>It's not perfect and needs reform but no farm assurance is not a alternative as retailers will demand their own .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treg, post: 8202056, member: 42292"] If we had more assurance schemes Standard RT , RT , RT Gold would that create competition? Or have we already got them RT, Pasture for life & Organic etc Did M& S assurance once that was nice very practical BUT on top of RT , so had to be RT assured to get M&S assurance on top . So would we better off leaving it to retailers? If they want to sell a product with a higher assurance then they inspect the farm to their standards? Where does that leave those of us that supply multiple retailers? They'll probably want different things so multiple paperwork? Which is why RT was created to save multiple inspections . It's not perfect and needs reform but no farm assurance is not a alternative as retailers will demand their own . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Opinion Harvester Survey - Red Tractor
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top