So you will need to wait 10 years from the date it was built thenSay it was built 3 maybe 4 years ago. Wahts the July 2012 deadline mean? Fully with you on all Ag sheds need Prior Approval.
So you will need to wait 10 years from the date it was built thenSay it was built 3 maybe 4 years ago. Wahts the July 2012 deadline mean? Fully with you on all Ag sheds need Prior Approval.
A very grey area, I would advise that the creation of a new structure and a new roof may be considered a new building but realistically who would know? I suppose it all comes down to who will know.To what extent can you repair an agricultural building without needing planning? Could you, say, erect a steel frame within the existing structure to carry a new roof?
It's a "Triggers broom" question really. If you could source a literally identical building and replace one piece at a time then the only tone it would be 100% new is when the last piece was swapped.To what extent can you repair an agricultural building without needing planning? Could you, say, erect a steel frame within the existing structure to carry a new roof?
Wrong threadwhen the lady piece was swapped.
View attachment 892974
the next Rural Business Network meeting is on planning. Particularly the NPPF
To register for this zoom visit www.rbn.org.uk
plugging the network because I’m a Member and I believe Networking with useful likeminded people is a great way to get ahead
the more useful people the better for everyone
Unfortunately, through personal experience I have discovered that Local Authorities in Wales are more than happy to allow these former dwellings to be reclaimed by the land around them.What is the criteria for a replacement dwelling where there is ruins of a previous cottage, there is no roof, in I think Pembrokeshire, possibly Carmarthenshire
What would be the situation if you did repair works to make it 'habitable', then apply to extend? Or does a break in use negate that path?Unfortunately, through personal experience I have discovered that Local Authorities in Wales are more than happy to allow these former dwellings to be reclaimed by the land around them.
I have had pre-apps with both Carmarthenshire (for myself) and Ceredigion (for a client) and both council's flatly refused to consider the sites to have any residential use once the buildings became inhabitable. I tried to argue the historic use and the 'betterment' to rebuild but was flatly knocked back as any residential use would constitute a new dwelling in the countryside which is unacceptable under the NPPF.
I had that thought but when I asked Carmarthenshire they said once it falls into disrepair and becomes uninhabitable it is no longer a dwelling so any works undertaken would be to a rural building and not to a dwellingWhat would be the situation if you did repair works to make it 'habitable', then apply to extend? Or does a break in use negate that path?
sorry, playing devils advocate - assuming one could afford to take the risk - carry out the repairs to make the dwelling habitable, reside there for a short period and then apply - do the planners need to know there was a period when it was uninhabitable?I had that thought but when I asked Carmarthenshire they said once it falls into disrepair and becomes uninhabitable it is no longer a dwelling so any works undertaken would be to a rural building and not to a dwelling
The burden of proof would be for the local authority to prove in enforcement terms.sorry, playing devils advocate - assuming one could afford to take the risk - carry out the repairs to make the dwelling habitable, reside there for a short period and then apply - do the planners need to know there was a period when it was uninhabitable?
I suspected that to be the caseUnfortunately, through personal experience I have discovered that Local Authorities in Wales are more than happy to allow these former dwellings to be reclaimed by the land around them.
I have had pre-apps with both Carmarthenshire (for myself) and Ceredigion (for a client) and both council's flatly refused to consider the sites to have any residential use once the buildings became inhabitable. I tried to argue the historic use and the 'betterment' to rebuild but was flatly knocked back as any residential use would constitute a new dwelling in the countryside which is unacceptable under the NPPF.
The building within a building is always a strange discussion. I believe in Planning terms it would be seen as intentiomally circumventing planning regulations. Do you remember the case where someone build a house in a barn and then took the barn down?Just a theoretical idea for a bit of fun...
I've got a portal frame building adjoining a traditional brick barn. Where the portal frame shed is, there used to be two traditional buildings which joined up to the existing brick barn.
Presumably I don't need planning permission for anything agricultural that is constructed within the portal shed.
So can I build the traditional brick buildings under the portal shed? Then remove the portal shed.
Can't think that that contravenes any rules, but soneone might know better. Thoughts?