Old earwig
Member
- Location
- North o' the border
Would it get FIT?D
Hi DG.
Apologies for inducing an involuntary supper ejection.
Site rent is clearly a priority here that this embryonic Ppa has not allowed for.
Judging by the discussion on another thread this too is a challenging area of debate.
I think the p/kW needs some work as does the escalator mechanism. it is worth noting that there is no insistence in their draft proposal to buy the leccy from the turbine.
I believe that the size of the turbine offered is ideal for our situation as for me it's not so much about FIT harvesting and more about generating power locally and sustainably. Others may also take this view..Also we are in a national park where turbine heights are severely restricted. This despite the fact that I can see well over a dozen hewge turbines in every direction from my farm.
That said it's not a commentary on the profitability of the exercise. Which is also a consideration.
Important matters of access roads, grid connection site, liability for every occasion need costing clearly.
Great feedback so far. Many thanks. Eocycle, if you are watching this thread is think you can see there's a bit of work to do!
Also make sure that there is an agreement in the contract that it gets felled if it's dead for 366 days and make sure that there is a locked in escrow fund for the clean up with specified conditions to release it to the land owner. Most likely need to take the founds down 60 -100cm.