Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
Press Complaints Commission rules badger TB image in Farmers Weekly is misleading
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dry Rot" data-source="post: 446206" data-attributes="member: 4505"><p>All publications do that because they don't have anything suitable on file. If their readers sent in GOOD QUALITY PUBLISHABLE RELEVANT pictures, they wouldn't have to. Same goes for video footage. Also, bear in mind, farmers will be out busy farming and not sat in the editorial office. The sub-editors are recruited from those who have qualifications/experience in publishing so, in the absence of guidance, they use pictures from an agency that in their opinion have public interest value. The object is to sell magazines, not pander to small minority.</p><p></p><p>I posted a similar rant when some clever person grumbled about the subject matter on the TV farming documentaries. If the producers don't know about the wonderful and interesting things you are doing on your farm, they can't come and do a documentary about it, can they? SO TELL THEM!</p><p></p><p>Duh! God give me strength!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dry Rot, post: 446206, member: 4505"] All publications do that because they don't have anything suitable on file. If their readers sent in GOOD QUALITY PUBLISHABLE RELEVANT pictures, they wouldn't have to. Same goes for video footage. Also, bear in mind, farmers will be out busy farming and not sat in the editorial office. The sub-editors are recruited from those who have qualifications/experience in publishing so, in the absence of guidance, they use pictures from an agency that in their opinion have public interest value. The object is to sell magazines, not pander to small minority. I posted a similar rant when some clever person grumbled about the subject matter on the TV farming documentaries. If the producers don't know about the wonderful and interesting things you are doing on your farm, they can't come and do a documentary about it, can they? SO TELL THEM! Duh! God give me strength! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Livestock
Livestock & Forage
Press Complaints Commission rules badger TB image in Farmers Weekly is misleading
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top