Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Prince Andrew
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Danllan" data-source="post: 7937046" data-attributes="member: 8735"><p>After the age of sixteen is reached statutory rape can't apply. The question then will become one of consent; that will depend upon on capacity and situation - i.e. was she in a fit mental state to agree to have sex or not?</p><p></p><p>Due to drugs, alcohol, or coercion / bullying, she may well not have been in a fit state to agree or capable of disagreeing, and that may have been applicable over either a very limited or very extended period. She could well have been a rather unfortunate girl, abused and taken advantage of, plied with whatever and pushed / forced into having sex with whoever her 'handlers' wished.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, she may well have been a bit naive - maybe just a typical seventeen year old. But could very well have been fully aware of what was going on and enjoyed the 'ride', so to speak, of jet-setting, meeting the rich and famous and of being spoilt. She may even have got a turn-on from it.</p><p></p><p>Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction makes the question of the accuser having been trafficked no longer moot - in the US anyway. So, presumably, the questions it will all turn on are whether or not sex between them took place and whether she was capable of giving and did give consent.</p><p></p><p>Bare in mind that the law will have changed since the time of the alleged offences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Danllan, post: 7937046, member: 8735"] After the age of sixteen is reached statutory rape can't apply. The question then will become one of consent; that will depend upon on capacity and situation - i.e. was she in a fit mental state to agree to have sex or not? Due to drugs, alcohol, or coercion / bullying, she may well not have been in a fit state to agree or capable of disagreeing, and that may have been applicable over either a very limited or very extended period. She could well have been a rather unfortunate girl, abused and taken advantage of, plied with whatever and pushed / forced into having sex with whoever her 'handlers' wished. On the other hand, she may well have been a bit naive - maybe just a typical seventeen year old. But could very well have been fully aware of what was going on and enjoyed the 'ride', so to speak, of jet-setting, meeting the rich and famous and of being spoilt. She may even have got a turn-on from it. Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction makes the question of the accuser having been trafficked no longer moot - in the US anyway. So, presumably, the questions it will all turn on are whether or not sex between them took place and whether she was capable of giving and did give consent. Bare in mind that the law will have changed since the time of the alleged offences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Politics, Covid19 and Brexit
Prince Andrew
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top