Professor Ian Boyd DEFRA exit interview

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
Anyone else hear him and his interview with Roger Harrabin on BBC Radio 4 Today programme a moment ago ?

Chief Scientific Advisor at DEFRA on leaving

UK Farming inefficient and will have to change

Red meat production will have to change to fast, inside production to reduce CO2 and methane overall production. Red meat consumption should also fall

Hills should be covered in trees not sheep and cattle

Harrabin’s report did state (but no counter interview) that the NFU was diametrically opposed to this view

I conclude he leaves a legacy of many Civil Servants affirmed to his beliefs

To me a massive kick in the nuts and for everything I hold so dear with regard to hill and extensive livestock farming working with natural resources and for real stock people who’ve created and maintain our beautiful landscape
 

David.

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
J11 M40
What do you expect, Defra was loaded with ministers and officials opposed to the status quo of maximum production agriculture under Blair from its inception, to rub farming's nose in the MAFF failings that led to foot and mouth. Surely you have not forgotten all the gleeful Orwellian references to the "New Normality", in the aftermath, and having then having put political non entities like Beckett in charge..
 

yellowbelly

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
N.Lincs
Seems from Wikipedia....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_L._Boyd
...that he is more of a marine scientist.
There's an interesting quote amongst that lot.....

In October 2013, Professor Boyd rebutted these opinions. Boyd stated that the point he was making in July was that "it is not their (scientists) job to make politicians' decisions for them – when scientists start providing opinions about whether policies are right or wrong they risk becoming politicised. A politicised scientist cannot also be an independent scientist."

.......seems he doesn't practice what he preaches :shifty:
 

delilah

Member
Partly. Belching is a pejorative term for a start. The radio didn't feature any of that alternative view

This is the problem though: There is nothing alternative about that NFU stance. They are still saying that methane from cows is a problem, and that it will be bred out of them.

METHANE FROM COWS IS NOT A PROBLEM.

Until the NFU get their heads around this, they continue to be part of the problem themselves.
 

delilah

Member
A response below. Quite good I thought from the NFU. Especially the part where Sir Ian says the NFU have too much political influence. ?https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-50092540

That article was posted further up, and my response above covers it. This is not a good response from the NFU, they are simply perpetuating the myth that methane from cows is a problem.
See the thread in the livestock section: What sort of an industry goes around admitting to crimes it hasn't committed ?

https://thefarmingforum.co.uk/index.php?threads/warning-contains-positive-news.303245/
 

PB1507

Member
Location
Lincs
I heard the report this morning and it did nothing to improve my rain sodden mood. Yet again an "expert" telling us all where we have gone wrong ? hasn't the policies of DEFRA got us where we are today ? And as for inefficiency, every challenge given to UK agriculture we rise to. Enjoy your retirement.
 

David.

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
J11 M40
Because he has letters after his name, to have any credibility you have to be a professional. Professors score double points; Lacey, he was right wasnt he..
 
Last edited:

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 68 32.1%
  • no

    Votes: 144 67.9%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 9,494
  • 123
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top