Accurate, easy to store, utilises existing machine, no fert in hedges/ditches, no bag disposal, less wind restrictions
Usually not the cheapest option, heavier than spray - more stress on sprayer, possible scorch
Usually someone comes along and says there is a risk of it rotting your sprayer, it doesn't, it's much cleaner to use than granular.
Nitrogen fertilizer is still corrosive, in whatever form.
Nitrogen fertilizer is still corrosive, in whatever form.
@Zan
I went liquid this last spring,I don't regret it now,I rent my tanks,I was on nozzles but switched to dribble bars,in my opinion far superior.
This year I've got 1/3 of my fert in solid,mainly so I can on my heavy ground with a bit lighter machine.I'm on 36m trams and had no issues with spreading at that distance,
I do really like the accuracy of liquid on the headland,especially as I've got a lot of small fields.
I'm well set up for both,bowser if on liquid fert and high lift trailer for solid.
It always amazes me more people don't use high lift trailers for solid fert,speeds the job up no end,then the forklift stops in the yard at the stack,plus you can put in as much or as little in the spreader,so its no different to a bowser.
I'm sat on the fence now, both have advantages and disadvantages.
Did someone mention scorch
I'll get my coat.
I can put my Amazone spreader on the back of my 3D aggribuggy.What's a lighter machine? Won't your s/p with wide tyres travel better anyway?
You won't rot much out with liquid urea, but both an and as in liquid form are very corrosive.