We already decided that they could stay in the houses as unless we decide to sell then that seemed the fairest option, we really don’t want to have to do this after so many years but because we have to as you say we want to be as fair as possible and as easy as possible for them as well.At what point would one discuss the likelihood of redundancy due to retirement with the employees? A friend of mine had to do this and part of the deal was cheap or little rent on the tied houses for a period following reduncy. The employer felt it important to ease the process, particularly as the employees were quite long standing.
I find it hard to believe that your workers are "unskilled"
Point of clarification - you don’t make a person redundant, you make a role redundant. If the work is still being done by another person, then you haven’t made anything redundant and you’re unfairly dismissing the person.
Get advice, and do
The problem is that neither of them want to work with computers or anything “new”. The job we would be looking to contract out is the sowing which neither of them want to do!I find it hard to believe that your workers are "unskilled"
The problem is that neither of them want to work with computers or anything “new”. The job we would be looking to contract out is the sowing which neither of them want to do!
who needs a computer to sow wheat?The problem is that neither of them want to work with computers or anything “new”. The job we would be looking to contract out is the sowing which neither of them want to do!
who needs a computer to sow wheat?
Fecking nonsense
No.Am I correct it saying that if you make an employee redundant and they live in a tied residence they have a right to a life times occupation and it can take many years to raise the rental value unless they are already paying an upto date rental price for the property?
Rarely works like that with long serving employees. As soon as employees realise that they are entitled to up to £15,750 redundancy pay they tend to hang to the end for dear life.I would advise your staff of your intentions confidentially, they may gain alternative employment in advance, so no need to pay out redundancy.
Our man left with the equivalent of nearly two years basic in his pocket.
I was still an arse.
I tell you this only because I hope you realise that however decently and sensitively you handle this, you will likely still be the bad'un.