Renting out land and potentially losing inheritance tax relief.

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
Hmm. I would not recommend taking speculative measures before they have got into power AND made these changes. Don't let the tax tail wag the business dog.

Grazing licences are quite different from a spud let. You are only renting out the grass growth, not the land itself and you still have management control through fencing etc. Of course you pay the grazier to spread the fertiliser or do it yourself... Naturally, you have a CAAV grazing licence in place that spells everything out, don't you?

A seasonal "let" where you hand over the land ploughed or otherwise means you don't have management control of that crop unless you construct a contract farming agreement where you "own" the crop and pay for the materials and operations or at least have an unpaid invoice showing that, and you sell the standing crop to them.

As always, the devil is in the detail and you should consult a professional advisor, not trust what some dodgy dude told you on the Internet 😉
 

Nearly

Member
Location
North of York
There will be an industry pop up to generate paperwork to make sure the boxes are ticked.
Too many mp's and business folk are invested in land to let all advantages disappear.
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
Remember that FBT let land is eligible for Business Property Relief. Removing BPR would upset many more folk. Beware of losing relief on the farmhouse if you fail the "active farmer" test. See the Antrobus, McKenna and Balfour test cases for details.
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
There will be an industry pop up to generate paperwork to make sure the boxes are ticked.
Too many mp's and business folk are invested in land to let all advantages disappear.
How many Labour MPs have farms? A lot less than the Tories do.

"Unearned" income e.g. rents has always been in the firing line by the taxman, hence the screws being turned on buy-to-lets. Don't shoot the messenger here - I'm well aware that a lot of property is bought with post tax income. Mine included.
 

teslacoils

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
They would have to get it passed, and then through a myriad of potential challenges.

The PLP still holds the yoke, and thats full of Islington-dwelling neo-socialists. Its not a red-flagged draped mass carrying burning brands.
 

serf

Member
Location
warwickshire
They would have to get it passed, and then through a myriad of potential challenges.

The PLP still holds the yoke, and thats full of Islington-dwelling neo-socialists. Its not a red-flagged draped mass carrying burning brands.
They could have an "emergency budget " on 8th July and change all thresholds so ppl are cornered from manoeuvring for IHT CGT BPR ect , who can stop them doing that 🤷
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
I like this saying, but in this instance the tax tail could be many times greater than the business dog.
Indeed. It has been one of the questions raised every time we change government. Britain is the only country to tax death as well as tax us to death. IHT raises several billion £ for the Treasury each year.

Socialism relies on other people's money. Odd how the Tories have shifted Left and Blair's New Labour were more Conservative! I'm not sure just how "tax the rich" the current Opposition is. Lots of millionaires in the Shadow Cabinet, just as Blair had ex Etonians in his.

The probable change of government 4th July does mean new taxes and moving goalposts. Maybe is would be best to appear as though you are trading and taking some trading risk? CFAs have been hard to challenge by the Exchequer in the past.
 

Salopian_Will

Member
BASE UK Member
Location
Shropshire
Remember that FBT let land is eligible for Business Property Relief. Removing BPR would upset many more folk. Beware of losing relief on the farmhouse if you fail the "active farmer" test. See the Antrobus, McKenna and Balfour test cases for details.

I don't think let land does qualify for BPR. Only APR.

The TFA have dropped a complete bollock on this one. Rather than advocating the benefits of the landlord tenant system, including APR relief and thus making landowners at ease in continuing to let land, they have concentrated on dividing landowners and tenants and in effect make it very difficult for any landowner to grant a new tenancy.
 
How many Labour MPs have farms? A lot less than the Tories do.

"Unearned" income e.g. rents has always been in the firing line by the taxman, hence the screws being turned on buy-to-lets. Don't shoot the messenger here - I'm well aware that a lot of property is bought with post tax income. Mine included.
Leeds council can't afford to pay tax on their buy to lets & they have some of the poorest housing stock in the country.
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
I don't think let land does qualify for BPR. Only APR.

The TFA have dropped a complete bollock on this one. Rather than advocating the benefits of the landlord tenant system, including APR relief and thus making landowners at ease in continuing to let land, they have concentrated on dividing landowners and tenants and in effect make it very difficult for any landowner to grant a new tenancy.
You are right. My bad. Let land is eligible for APR, not BPR. BPR is available on assets used in trading, subject to Ts & Cs. I phoned a friend on that one.

I will edit my earlier post.
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 68 32.2%
  • no

    Votes: 143 67.8%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 8,057
  • 118
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top