- Location
- Fife
If it works for you it works for you.
I've already stated I am opposed to routine trimming of all sheep
You are quite right to question dogmatic approaches to anything, we do not practice routine foot trimming but if a sheep is lame and requires some level of trimming it gets it. The most obvious example of this would be gapping up the side of the hoof wall, this can fill with dirt and sometimes grit and become infected. This needs removed by trimming and at least sprayed, anyone who wouldn't do this because of unquestioning faith in some religious foot care regime would be better with no sheep.
I agree, that is why I stated at the beginning of the post that I do not practise routine trimming only occasional lame sheep that require it.I understood your post from yesterday evening as justifying routine trimming, as it is done in cattle, then why not sheep? Apologies if I read it wrong.
Of course the situation described above would receive treatment, it's not routine though is it?
Hardly dogma either, just common sense I would think.
There is massive improvement to be made in the national flock lameness wise, there are unseen costs with it that are hard to quantify too. How can you ever hope to achieve a decent LSU/labour unit with persistently lame sheep?
Not all cattle are trimmed 3 times a year, housed herds that are fed hard get routine trimming and it's a cost effective preventative. Never been able to justify it with sheep thoughDespite not having anything to do with cattle I've been watching The Hoof G.P on Youtube and he mentioned today that cattle are routine trimmed up to 3 times a year. Should all of those cattle be culled or is the fact that they live in modified environments enough reason to accept routine foot trimming? If so, why all the palaver about foot trimming sheep? Very few sheep live the way their ancestors did?