- Location
- flintshire
rubber rings on lambs tails, what are people thought's, does it make them more susceptible to joint ill?? its easy and does the job but would it be more beneficail to just hot cut them later in field older???
If you lamb inside, you'd be mad not to ring tails before turnout. Just be strict with hygiene, as @Al R rightly says and make double sure they all get plenty of colostrum.rubber rings on lambs tails, what are people thought's, does it make them more susceptible to joint ill?? its easy and does the job but would it be more beneficail to just hot cut them later in field older???
I have no doubt that there is a difference between the quality of some rubber rings. I had some poor quality ones last year which prolonged the process of the tail coming off cleanly. This resulted in sores being exposed around the 'ringing area' which in my opinion increased the incidence of joint ill.rubber rings on lambs tails, what are people thought's, does it make them more susceptible to joint ill?? its easy and does the job but would it be more beneficail to just hot cut them later in field older???
Sorry @Danllan, do you mean that Dunbia are considering levying a charge on undocked lambs?We've not been ringing because we have Easycares and it's just another job I can do without. However... I have a chum at Dunbia who has told me that it may well soon be more than just 'preferred'; I guess that when and if (ha!) clipping charges bite it will be an effective obligation. No surprises there... .
No idea, but was discussing my last lot with him and he mentioned tails being rather unpopular, nothing more - it is my inference beyond that. I am sure clipping will be the thing that comes to a head first... .Sorry @Danllan, do you mean that Dunbia are considering levying a charge on undocked lambs?
No idea, but was discussing my last lot with him and he mentioned tails being rather unpopular, nothing more - it is my inference beyond that. I am sure clipping will be the thing that comes to a head first... .
Ugh... that reminds me of the old effort of trying to substitute pigs' nerves for spaghetti... .Oh bugger!
I was hoping you were going to say "tails on" was going to be rewarded,
Like maybe they'd found a new market for lambs tails!
I'm so tempted to not bother ringing any of my exlanas but not if it's going to create negative marketing.
Oh bugger!
I was hoping you were going to say "tails on" was going to be rewarded,
Like maybe they'd found a new market for lambs tails!
I'm so tempted to not bother ringing any of my exlanas but not if it's going to create negative marketing.
That is a very good point, nevertheless it would be unwise to completely ignore the preferences of those we rely on economically. But I think you have hit on the fulcrum which gives a little bit more leverage to the supplier on this matter.Well you just have to point out to any processor that forcing mutilation on animals could be very bad marketing as well as a potential welfare issue