Found the umbilical to be bad for smearing the surface as its dragged over the whole field.
We've used a dribble bar on the umbilical for 5 years now,never been a problem with smearing.
Found the umbilical to be bad for smearing the surface as its dragged over the whole field.
who established this?Ok, so we have established that slurry is bad for the soil. Now the question remains now whether it is simply because there is so much manure applied at once or is it the actual cow sh1t and p1ss that is damaging tot he worms? This would indicate that grazing may have the same effect albeit to a lesser degree?
People say that we must be spreading to much slurry, but we only spread slurry after it has been cut for silage on ground that is never grazed. The fields are simply getting the amount of muck that they actually produced.
the bloke from the bff who thinks that grazing 2 foot high swards and tramping in to ground is superior to well kept grass leys?The way I understand it is that if you use ivermectins then your not helping the worms much. I think ruminant noticed a big difference when he didn't use it last year in the speed the muck broke down. I don't thinl you can say it animals are good or bad as alot will depend on the system.
The best thing with a injector,dribble bar or shoe is the gaps give the worms somewhere to go.
aye same here palI think aerobic and anerobic decomposition (composting) has something to do with it, plus the particulate size of the semi soli
With I had two feet of grass the cows could look at, never mind trample this year.
Ok, so we have established that slurry is bad for the soil. Now the question remains now whether it is simply because there is so much manure applied at once or is it the actual cow sh1t and p1ss that is damaging tot he worms? This would indicate that grazing may have the same effect albeit to a lesser degree?
People say that we must be spreading to much slurry, but we only spread slurry after it has been cut for silage on ground that is never grazed. The fields are simply getting the amount of muck that they actually produced.
who established this?
I really should read posts other than my own,The study that was posted on an earlier post plus anecdotal evidence which all points to it having either a negative or neutral effect on earthworms. I haven't heard anyone say that it is good for them.
You can put upto 5000 gallons of slurry per acre in one dressing without killing worms or causing harm.
That's a serious amount of slurry, surely would do more damage than good. Only allowed 4500g/acre in NI because of NVZ. Surely much more efficient to apply half that amount with trailing shoe or dribble bar?
That's a serious amount of slurry, surely would do more damage than good. Only allowed 4500g/acre in NI because of NVZ. Surely much more efficient to apply half that amount with trailing shoe or dribble bar?
Correct, used to spread umbilical slurry on a big scale, and at reeling in time we would notice hundreds of thousands of worms dead on the surface of the slurry if spread thick n wet. Makes sense to me, as the vibrations from umbilical last all day, like a heave shower, a tanker would be more intermittent.This is what I was told by an agri adviser-when rain falls it causes vibrations which makes the earthworms to come to the surface.spreading slurry causes the same vibrations but the slurry seals the ground and earthworms can't come through leading them to drown.