FarmerStef
New Member
Hi All,
Just need some advice. Have an opportunity to apply for the lease of a smallholding and the landlord seems favourable as to considering my bid (am already a tennant of his in another property). However, there is an agricultural tie on the property in question and it is not big enough to function as a purely agricultural business (10 acres) so my initial proposal was based on what would be my main source of income, for which I will only need to utilise about 1.5 acres, but am looking at options to split my business plan between both an agricultural and non agricultural venture, potentially using the remaining land to breed either sheep or alpacas. The landlord's obstacles are that he is concerned about inheritance tax, the kind of lease he can let it under etc. My question is: Can I still lease under agricultural tie if the majority of the income (but not the majority of the use of land) is from non agricultural (but still animal related) business? Does anyone have any good suggestions for the use of the rest of the land? Have to clarify that I am qualified and been farm manager on small diverse farms (kinderboerderij=City farm in Holland, a format of farming aimed at education but not as a charity and I haven't really seen here). Any advice very welcome
Just need some advice. Have an opportunity to apply for the lease of a smallholding and the landlord seems favourable as to considering my bid (am already a tennant of his in another property). However, there is an agricultural tie on the property in question and it is not big enough to function as a purely agricultural business (10 acres) so my initial proposal was based on what would be my main source of income, for which I will only need to utilise about 1.5 acres, but am looking at options to split my business plan between both an agricultural and non agricultural venture, potentially using the remaining land to breed either sheep or alpacas. The landlord's obstacles are that he is concerned about inheritance tax, the kind of lease he can let it under etc. My question is: Can I still lease under agricultural tie if the majority of the income (but not the majority of the use of land) is from non agricultural (but still animal related) business? Does anyone have any good suggestions for the use of the rest of the land? Have to clarify that I am qualified and been farm manager on small diverse farms (kinderboerderij=City farm in Holland, a format of farming aimed at education but not as a charity and I haven't really seen here). Any advice very welcome