- Location
- Somerset UK
I always wonder about the number of hours it takes, if you include the extra hours taken to make the bigger tractors and kit or to mine the extra iron ore to make them does it take any less time? I seem to remember reading somewhere that in ancient times it was possible to buy a good set of clothes a belt and some decent shoes for an ounce of gold. If you go to a London tailors now the same stuff will still set you back about an ounce of gold. The same human effort has gone into the mining, but instead of using a pick and shovel it's spent making the machinery required, in better working conditions.I often read threads like these with some confusion. Why is it that on TFF labour as a cost is never discussed? All you ever read is a mention of shiny tractors and criticism of anyone running a Fendt as it is such an obvious excess.
Let's assume the weather today is plenty cooperative enough, and harvesting spuds for weeks on end is actually a doddle. Now, I want you to go and find 2 tractor drivers willing to run two little trailed harvesters for say, near 500 hours over the spud harvest. And then go and find 10 tractor and trailer drivers who are keen as much to run the things to store.
Assuming harvest takes about 500 hours to complete (80 hours a week for 6 weeks plus a bit of time to use a grease gun), well the old system used 12 blokes, so that is 6000 man-hours assuming you can actually find someone to sit in the seat.
Why do people seem unable to actually value their own time or that of anyone else? Maybe the bloke likes his self propelled harvester and 240 horse power Fendt and the operators are chuffed as nuts with them and willing to perch in the seat in all weathers?