One of the abiding themes in Charles Massy's book is that we are living in the Anthropocene, which is basically a man-made geological epoch. It has superceded the Holocene, in which early man followed the retreating glaciers as the ice-age ended. These primitive humans had a relatively benigh impact on the planet, but now we are witnessing mass species extinction, global climate change, desertification and all the other horrors, which has given rise to the term Anthropocene. In large part this is because we view ourselves as above the rest of creation (witness the quote from Genesis above).
Now I love our local Church, but increasingly more as a building and a concept than what it teaches. I feel we need to see the world for what it is, a beautiful self-organising and incredibly complex ecosystem which we can work with to feed and clothe ourselves, having seen what happens when we try to work against it. By any ethical standards, most facets of industrial agriculture are simply wrong, so we need to find ways of doing it right if we are going to live the good life ourselves and, at the same time, heal the planet.
Unfortunately our culture as it stands is ego driven, we've moved on a bit from the worst excesses of the ghastly 'greed is good' years of the 1980's, but I suspect we'll need to sink a bit lower before there's a mass movement to get Gaia back on track. The problem is, the deeper you sink into the 'material world' the further you get from the spirit world, where we can connect with the rest of creation as equals. I think there's an important link here with the Knepp experiment (talked about in the Wilding thread elsewhere on the Holistic forum), little islands of wilderness help us make this connection.
Aldo Leopold and others talk about a 'Land Ethic', which makes sense to me. Land ownership is a slippery slope, if it means you can abuse the land however much you like. Every acre is part of Gaia, it needs treating as such. Having that spiritual connection helps the farmer to 'do the right thing'.
I wouldn’t write off the church because of alleged misinterpretation of a passage in Genesis. The bible needs to be taken in context and as a whole, interpreted by itself, ie if your interpretation of one passage is quite contradictory to other parts, then it is probably wrong. The whole book carries the same themes and message throughout.
The bible’s main focus is the story of man’s relationship with God, past, present and future, and certainly does not exist to promote the worship of created things, but following sound biblical doctrine and principles should put you in no way at odds with the natural environment, what is good for the natural environment is good for us all, and falls under ‘love your neighbour as yourself’, Mark 12v21
‘Dominion’ shouldn’t be a dirty word, what else is grazing animals holistically in mobs on diverse pastures other than dominion? It is more our sinful nature that makes dominion a bad thing. Rather than submitting to God, have we not all wanted, rather, to be gods ourselves? Was this not the original temptation in the garden?
Dominion over the animals is explained quite well here:
https://www.gotquestions.org/dominion-over-animals.html
It’s quite a good website actually.