I’m sure your right they wont Do them selves any favours if they do though.rubbish are they, they are just going through the motions, ticking a box and will carry on regardless.
they need to be reminded who pays there wages!
I’m sure your right they wont Do them selves any favours if they do though.rubbish are they, they are just going through the motions, ticking a box and will carry on regardless.
i know its not quite the thing but...We don't grow wheat any more but when we used to deliver our grain to local merchant, in a busy year there were heaps all over the concrete, both assured and non-assured. Didn't get shifted inside on the same day either. Of course the yard is totally rat and bird proof.
I’m sure your right they wont Do them selves any favours if they do though.
they need to be reminded who pays there wages!
So when are you going to start this mass resignation @Chris F @Clive - your hyping everyone up, telling them that RT will only listen if you resign, so when are you going to take the lead and get on with it?Their statement literally says they don’t care what farmers say unless you say it in their pre-defined way via their consultation.
It’s a strategy used by larger companies to control information flows and ensure they can respond how they want to. It also means they don’t have to bother acknowledging that 95% of farmers say they want to leave on a poll on here.
They will only care about the farmers who pay they wages, when en masse those farmers stop paying their wages. That they will listen to.
We don't grow wheat any more but when we used to deliver our grain to local merchant, in a busy year there were heaps all over the concrete, both assured and non-assured. Didn't get shifted inside on the same day either. Of course the yard is totally rat and bird proof.
They might think its arrogant of tff to think that it carries weight to influence it, many posters arent assurance members ,and a majority of farmers wouldnt be members of tff.The bit that worries me is that stakeholders - ie retail carry as much weight as farmers. Also that they only care about what you say if you want to go through the hour long process of filling in their consultation. NOTHING else matters.
The arrogance of this is astounding.
The majority of farmers may not be members of TFF, As far as I know, very few of the farmers I know and meet in market (in more normal times) are but most of the ones I do know are and have been for some time, quite critical of RT.They might think its arrogant of tff to think that it carries weight to influence it, many posters arent assurance members ,and a majority of farmers wouldnt be members of tff.
i think @Werzle is right that it’s arrogant to suggest TFF is today’s farmers platform and representative of the general view of British farmers. I know loads of farmers seriously disillusioned by RT - but unlikely to resign anytime soon!The majority of farmers may not be members of TFF, As far as I know, very few of the farmers I know and meet in market (in more normal times) are but most of the ones I do know are and have been for some time, quite critical of RT.
So it’s not so much how many are members of TFF but are the views on TFF representative of the wider industry............and I’d say they were, infact I’d go as far as to say they’re less critical here, or at least the language used is more civilised.
They might think its arrogant of tff to think that it carries weight to influence it, many posters arent assurance members ,and a majority of farmers wouldnt be members of tff.
The majority of farmers may not be members of TFF, As far as I know, very few of the farmers I know and meet in market (in more normal times) are but most of the ones I do know are and have been for some time, quite critical of RT.
So it’s not so much how many are members of TFF but are the views on TFF representative of the wider industry............and I’d say they were, infact I’d go as far as to say they’re less critical here, or at least the language used is more civilised.
Paying members are the only stakeholders.As paying members are all stakeholders really,
Clive claiming TFF IS the place where U.K. farmers spend there time these days and that’s where RT should be looking is implying TFF represents farmers views.its fair to say that most uk farmers visa TFF - 30,000 unique visitors every day 85% from UK certainly not all will be farmers but even if a smsllish % are thats still a LOT of farmers and other industry stakeholders. The numbers dwarf any other ag media, show or representation organisation now
imo TFF would not be a lot of interest for those not involved in the industry and we don’t see a lot of none industry posts
as above though, TFF does. not represent anyone, it simply provides a platform do individuals can represent themselves and a valuable direct engagement tool for wider industry stakeholders
So when are you going to start this mass resignation?
what you should have is a group representing all farmers kind of like a coopretive of maybe a union...................na that would never workBecause we can't speak with one voice, we get shafted by those who do. It's easier for few retailers to "align their views", although some may call it colluding, than 40000 producers.
I see no point in us having higher standards simply to receive the same price. Gold plating requires gold in the pocket.
they would have no choice if most leftFarm assurance will only crumble when merchants, mills & maltings start advertising that they will take non-assured cereals...
Clive claiming TFF IS the place where U.K. farmers spend there time these days and that’s where RT should be looking is implying TFF represents farmers views.
Clive claiming TFF IS the place where U.K. farmers spend there time these days and that’s where RT should be looking is implying TFF represents farmers views.
We have requested a statement from Red Tractor to see if they will be taking into account what individual farmers are saying
I wasn’t trying to say that TFF represents all farmers, more that the opinions voiced on TFF are pretty much in line with those who I speak to who to the best of my knowledge aren’t on TFF.i think @Werzle is right that it’s arrogant to suggest TFF is today’s farmers platform and representative of the general view of British farmers. I know loads of farmers seriously disillusioned by RT - but unlikely to resign anytime soon!