Sugar beet – Should neonics return?

CPM.jpg


Written by cpm

Download PDF The granting of an emergency authorisation for use of a neonicotinoid seed treatment in sugar beet has attracted a lot of criticism, even within the farming community. CPM tunes into the debate about whether this marks a forward or backward step for the industry. It takes time to develop alternative solutions. By Lucy de la Pasture There’s no doubt the threat from virus yellows has been very real during the current sugar beet campaign. Unprecedented numbers of aphids descended on crops, even as some were struggling to emerge during dry weather in spring. The result was virus transmission that proved impossible to stem, even with the insecticides growers could apply under the handful of EAMUs granted for the season. By autumn yield losses of up to 80% were being reported in the worst hit areas, a situation that even with the compensatory scheme hastily put together by British Sugar meant many sugar beet growers were reducing their planned acreage for 2021 or considering giving the crop up all together. The industry was on the ropes. While many regard the neonic derogation as a lifeline for the UK’s sugar industry, others are concerned that falling back to reliance on…
The post Sugar beet – Should neonics return? appeared first on cpm magazine.

Continue reading on CPM website...

If you are enjoying what you read then why not considering subscribing:

 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 68 32.1%
  • no

    Votes: 144 67.9%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 9,438
  • 123
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top