Exfarmer
Member
- Location
- Bury St Edmunds
To be fair to the club, it was a good kick
he'd lay on the ground rolling about like a poofy ballet dancer for 10 minutes waiting for the magic spongeif another player kicked him like that he would get a red card!
Three worrying things about the Zouma footage:
You can hear someone laughing
He does it in front of a child.
Does it even though he knows he's being filmed.
Anyone who resorts to physical abuse of a small animal (apparently for fun) must have some serious personality defects.
Except ballet dancers are made of much sterner stuff. The footballer would be on the ground rolling about like other footballers.he'd lay on he ground rolling about like a poofy ballet dancer for 10 minutes waiting for the magic sponge
The RSPCA got the Warrant to seize the cats in record time. Shameful that Social Services dither so long to get Warrants to remove abused children from their tormentors. Sometimes they wait so long that children die.
The RSPCA got the Warrant to seize the cats in record time. Shameful that Social Services dither so long to get Warrants to remove abused children from their tormentors. Sometimes they wait so long that children die.
There was something on the Today program this morning saying that it costs councils about £4500. PER WEEK!!! for a place in a children’s home. You’ve got to wonder how the provision of a safe environment for a child in need has got so out of kilter with reality. (Just to be clear - that means that putting a child into a children’s home for just two years costs almost half a million pounds.)The RSPCA got the Warrant to seize the cats in record time. Shameful that Social Services dither so long to get Warrants to remove abused children from their tormentors. Sometimes they wait so long that children die.
Childrens homes are a farce, we have moved from the Dr Barnardos homes , where a good friend of mine grew up and then went on to prosper in the community. Where children were literally fenced in and frequently educated with aid of a cane.There was something on the Today program this morning saying that it costs councils about £4500. PER WEEK!!! for a place in a children’s home. You’ve got to wonder how the provision of a safe environment for a child in need has got so out of kilter with reality. (Just to be clear - that means that putting a child into a children’s home for just two years costs almost half a million pounds.)
I’ve heard that before and it just seems wrong. As a dad, if I thought my kids were getting up to no good of an evening when they were 12,13,14 years old, I’d have a bloody good go at not allowing them out. It seems like a gross dereliction of duty that when ‘the authorities’ assume responsibility for children they do not restrict their liberty a bit where necessary.Childrens homes are a farce, we have moved from the Dr Barnardos homes , where a good friend of mine grew up and then went on to prosper in the community. Where children were literally fenced in and frequently educated with aid of a cane.
To todays world where sometimes one, but often 3-4 are looked after by a rotating team of possibly 8-10 people, but they cannot physically restrict the liberty of the children, so the ones who are the most difficult rarely get any education and often get entwined in prostitution and the drugs trade.
Make no mistake some do come through the system well and of course many are grossly disturbed before they ever enter the system.
But it is very strange when we consider how much cheaper it would be to send many of these most difficult cases to Eton
Childrens homes are a farce, we have moved from the Dr Barnardos homes , where a good friend of mine grew up and then went on to prosper in the community. Where children were literally fenced in and frequently educated with aid of a cane.
To todays world where sometimes one, but often 3-4 are looked after by a rotating team of possibly 8-10 people, but they cannot physically restrict the liberty of the children, so the ones who are the most difficult rarely get any education and often get entwined in prostitution and the drugs trade.
Make no mistake some do come through the system well and of course many are grossly disturbed before they ever enter the system.
But it is very strange when we consider how much cheaper it would be to send many of these most difficult cases to Eton
Some of theses kids are so mentally screwed up , that they soak up enormous financial resources, alot aren't your every day childrenThere was something on the Today program this morning saying that it costs councils about £4500. PER WEEK!!! for a place in a children’s home. You’ve got to wonder how the provision of a safe environment for a child in need has got so out of kilter with reality. (Just to be clear - that means that putting a child into a children’s home for just two years costs almost half a million pounds.)
Go easy, we all know the rules are different for luvvies.That would be the Kirsty Gallagher caught drink driving and banned for two years?
Which is worse?
so, is she famous then?Go easy, we all know the rules are different for luvvies.
Plus she has a sore ear that prevents her getting up early, as wel…. so….errrr
Go easy, we all know the rules are different for luvvies.
Plus she has a sore ear that prevents her getting up early, as wel…. so….errrr
True. Some will be irreparably damaged in-utero through drink/drug use during pregnancy but many will have the potential to become valuable members of society. The two things that many will lack are 1) a loving, dependable parent figure at home. 2) boundaries/discipline. Sticking them in childrens homes where they get managed by committee and where they don’t have set boundaries isn’t going to help them.Some of theses kids are so mentally screwed up , that they soak up enormous financial resources, alot aren't your every day children
It is, shows the double standards in polite society.But it’s an interesting point though isn’t it?
Case one: drink driver
Case two: animal abuser
Which is worse?