banjo
Member
- Location
- Back of beyond
Until you actually pull the original data then create a mean temprature yourself, all you are doing is taking someone else's word for it.
Now there are official data sources, and the data in your link.
When this data is presented in other graphs it's presented as a mean temp for the year, this is percentage of days over 95F (35c)
So it's not a mean temprature, all it says is there were more hot days, but it excludes cold night and cold days, it has zero to do with mean temperatures.
If it had 100 hotter than average days but had a 100 cooler than average, by similar margins in the same year they cancel each other out in the mean temprature readings it's the only way to track small changes in temperatures over time with any accuracy. An Individual days temperatures, is just noise until it's turned into a mean temperature.
If you want to prove that period had a hot mean temprature you need to find a graph showing it, that you think is untampered.
Or go pull the data yourself. Me I trust the official sources.
Just go onto the Steve Goddard link I put up earlier and you can click on any graph you want, just find sea level changes fir instance, click on that and all the graphs related to that show up, I cannot do anymore, it's all there if you look, or the hockey stick fraud, click on that it will show you what he had. It's very good and I hope it helps.