The most dangerous man in the world

[wanton dwarf]

The investigation was completed. I strongly urge you to read the details. They then subsequently reopened it when more evidence indirectly came to light.

Your fanboi love of drymp cant argue with fact. If you believe the case was dropped due to political persuasions then your complaint should be directed at the top brass of the DoJ.

Comey was fired for refusing to be a yes man for Trump and this fact was well known and documented. You are either ignorant of that fact or being deliberately disingenious by suggesting otherwise.

I don't need to do this.

It's already being done.

 

[ollie989898]

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/ig-report-clinton-email-investigation/index.html

"Comey Legacy
The report provides a detailed accounting of the series of events leading up to Comey's decision in July 2016 to announce publicly — without Justice Department approval — that while he found Clinton's actions "extremely careless," he would not recommend charges against her."


The fact Comey used this language enabled Hilary to NOT be charged with an offence of "Gross Negligent" ..


https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-grassley/index.html

"A source familiar with the FBI decision tells CNN that Comey and his FBI colleagues were "playing with the language throughout" the process, but consistently held the belief that they needed to condemn Clinton's handling of classified information while asserting they would not bring charges."


BTW Comey also used a private email server.

BTW BTW it looks as though the Senate wants to talk to Julian Assange which MIGHT lead to him getting a presidential pardon.

You just said he prematurely dropped an investigation. Now its he recommended against a prosecution. Which is it?

I again urge you to watch the entire select committee hearing in full, the reasons for his decision are outlined in full. CNN I would suggest, have political motivations which I know you would never approve of, given you quest for good old fashioned truth.

 

[ollie989898]

I don't need to do this.

It's already being done.

You are an idiot who does not understand the facts.

The chief of the FBI does not decide who will be prosecuted or not. That is the realm of the department of Justice.

How many times do you want me to type the same thing?

Trump thinks he can manhandle the DoJ, Attorney general and the FBI, three institutions who categorically must remain apolitical for reasons anyone with an ounce of common sense would understand. No wonder anyone he deals with starts taking notes or recording their meetings, the bloke is blundering around and will eventually be impeached. Even the Republicans have a streak who dislike him immensely, and it is hardly surprising; he is actually a po-face liberal from New York.

 

[wanton dwarf]

You are an idiot who does not understand the facts.

The chief of the FBI does not decide who will be prosecuted or not. That is the realm of the department of Justice.

How many times do you want me to type the same thing?

I've just posted two reports that highlight that Comey made a choice of language to use to sheild Hilary Clinton which are against FBI policy.

Hilary could NOT be prosecuted for negligance because Comey failed to use that language.

QED.

 

[ollie989898]

I've just posted two reports that highlight that Comey made a choice of language to use to sheild Hilary Clinton which are against FBI policy.

Hilary could NOT be prosecuted for negligance because Comey failed to use that language.

QED.

You need to listen to the select committee hearing in full.

Comey stated what the findings of his investigation were, I suggest you learn that first. He also stated that in numerous other cases similar to this (including others long before his time in the FBI), there had been no prosecution, either. How simple would you like me to make this for you?

 

[wanton dwarf]

Trump thinks he can manhandle the DoJ, Attorney general and the FBI, three institutions who categorically must remain apolitical

The whole point is they are NOT apolitical.

That's why Strukz has been investigated and been escorted from the FBI buildings.

The videos I posted previously detail the FBI & DoJ corruption and the wives that have made money within Fusion GPS.

You're really acting Butt hurt, I've no idea why because it's at least a year before the crap hits the fan with them.

 

[ollie989898]

The whole point is they are NOT apolitical.

That's why Strukz has been investigated and been escorted from the FBI buildings.

The videos I posted previously detail the FBI & DoJ corruption and the wives that have made money withon Fusion GPS.

You're really acting Butt hurt, I've no idea why because it's at least a year before the crap hits the fan with them.

I am not butt hurt, I couldn't give a fudge either way to be fair. I followed the entire issue out of personal interest, nothing more.

If you are claiming there is widespread FBI and DoJ corruption that is a very heady claim indeed, I hope you have evidence and a collection of whistle-blowers just lining up to testify to that end.

The fact is, your boy drumpf is going to be subpoenaed before long in a quest for witnesses due to his idiot son being in league with the Russians and shady property deals. He won't be able to refuse, he will instead try to remove Mueller and that will be a direct re-run of Nixon- obstruction of justice. After the raid on Cohen's offices the game is well and truly up. Even after he finished the Presidency he will be chased for hundreds of millions of dollars, I forget how many lawsuits he is already the subject of. No wonder his personal lawyer found the kitchen too hot.

I am not away of what wrong-doing Peter Strzok is being accused of, besides detesting Trump, a crime of which half the country is probably guilty. Though I am no legal expert, text messages can be confusing at the best of times.

 

[wanton dwarf]

You need to listen to the select committee hearing in full.

Comey stated what the findings of his investigation were, I suggest you learn that first. He also stated that in numerous other cases similar to this (including others long before his time in the FBI), there had been no prosecution, either. How simple would you like me to make this for you?

So wrong on the fact Comey had control of Hilary Clinton being prosecuted.

All he had to do was say the correct words .. he did not.

I think other articles highlight where those words have been used .. that's the whole point. Most likely it's because Comey himself used an email server which he should not have.

 

[wanton dwarf]

If you are claiming there is widespread FBI and DoJ corruption that is a very heady claim indeed, I hope you have evidence and a collection of whistle-blowers just lining up to testify to that end.

I didn't say how deep the corruption goes. But individuals are being investigated as you know.

Looks like Democrat corruption on a significant scale.

Mueller either has something or does not. Either he has found Russian collusion or not.

 

[ollie989898]

So wrong on the fact Comey had control of Hilary Clinton being prosecuted.

All he had to do was say the correct words .. he did not.

I think other articles highlight where those words have been used .. that's the whole point. Most likely it's because Comey himself used an email server which he should not have.

Listen, for the final time, Comey, nor any other member of the FBI, can decide who will be prosecuted or not. He can give a recommendation to the department of justice, who may or may heed it, that is for them to decide. Prosecutors, in particular, are not foolhardy: they do not bring people to trial unless they categorically know they can present a convincing case.

 

[ollie989898]

I didn't say how deep the corruption goes. But individuals are being investigated as you know.

Looks like Democrat corruption on a significant scale.

Mueller either has something or does not. Either he has found Russian collusion or not.

Again, I urge you to watch youtube or read transcripts. You seem to believe that the FBI, DoJ and also a signficant portion of the Democrat political establishment are corrupt. Unfortunately neither you nor drumpf understand that you actually need evidence to make claims of that gravity.

You must also realise, (and would already) that a significant number of the Republican party are not-impressed with Trump nor the growing weight of evidence and witnesses who are being deployed by Mueller.

All of the select committee hearings I have watched are chaired in a bipartisan manner. They both ask very difficult questions. I will watch in earnest when they get to work on Manafort, Flynn and Bannon.

 

[wanton dwarf]

Listen, for the final time, Comey, nor any other member of the FBI, can decide who will be prosecuted or not. He can give a recommendation to the department of justice, who may or may heed it, that is for them to decide. Prosecutors, in particular, are not foolhardy: they do not bring people to trial unless they categorically know they can present a convincing case.

Despite me posting the facts multiple times here you are again posting as though you alone are correct.

It says even in your fanboy CNN articles that because Comey didn't use the correct language Hilary could not be prosecuted.

Keep making a fool of yourself as much as you like. It's there in black and white.

 

[ollie989898]

I didn't say how deep the corruption goes. But individuals are being investigated as you know.

Looks like Democrat corruption on a significant scale.

Mueller either has something or does not. Either he has found Russian collusion or not.

I think you need to review the actual scope of the Mueller investigation.

Why are you and Trump complaining so much if your boy is clean? If I had nothing to hide, I would let the investigation do it's thing and then use it for political capital.

 

[ollie989898]

Despite me posting the facts multiple times here you are again posting as though you alone are correct.

It says even in your fanboy CNN articles that because Comey didn't use the correct language Hilary could not be prosecuted.

Keep making a fool of yourself as much as you like. It's there in black and white.

WATCH THE FUDGING VIDEO. Seriously.

 

[wanton dwarf]

You must also realise, (and would already) that a significant number of the Republican party are not-impressed with Trump nor the growing weight of evidence and witnesses who are being deployed by Mueller.

Proof ?

Nothing has been released on Russian Collusion.

 

[wanton dwarf]

I think you need to review the actual scope of the Mueller investigation.

Why are you and Trump complaining so much if your boy is clean? If I had nothing to hide, I would let the investigation do it's thing and then use it for political capital.

I'm not complaining at anything.

I'm pointing out again how you fail to give the full facts.

In fact despite the facts being given in black and white you continue to deny the truth.

 

[ollie989898]

Proof ?

Nothing has been released on Russian Collusion.

Dude, there is widespread evidence that the Russians interfered with the American presidential election.

I think you need to recognise the scope of the investigation. Thankfully, a cut ans paste from wiki will save me from wasting yet more of my time on you:

The ongoing Special Counsel investigation is a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including an investigation of any possible links and/or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government, "and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation." The scope of the investigation reportedly also includes potential obstruction of justice by Trump and others.[1] Since May 2017, the investigation has been led by a United States Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, a former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Mueller's investigation took over several FBI investigations including those involving former campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, both of which started before the 2016 presidential election.[2]

 

[ollie989898]

I'm not complaining at anything.

I'm pointing out again how you fail to give the full facts.

In fact despite the facts being given in black and white you continue to deny the truth.

Go away and watch the video. Here is a very straight-forward precis:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/05/fbi-no-charges-hillary-clinton-email-investigation

 

[wanton dwarf]

Dude, there is widespread evidence that the Russians interfered with the American presidential election.

I think you need to recognise the scope of the investigation. Thankfully, a cut ans paste from wiki will save me from wasting yet more of my time on you:

The ongoing Special Counsel investigation is a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including an investigation of any possible links and/or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government, "and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation." The scope of the investigation reportedly also includes potential obstruction of justice by Trump and others.[1] Since May 2017, the investigation has been led by a United States Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, a former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Mueller's investigation took over several FBI investigations including those involving former campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, both of which started before the 2016 presidential election.[2]

That's not proof of Trump's collusion with Russia.

Where is the proof ?

 

[baabaa]