The Red Tractor ACCS referendum

Would you leave or remain a Red Tractor ACCS member ?

  • Yes, I would resign my Red Tractor (ACCS) membership and join a new "equal to imports" Scheme

    Votes: 659 96.1%
  • No, I would remain in the Red Tractor scheme

    Votes: 27 3.9%

  • Total voters
    686

FarmyStu

Member
Location
NE Lincs
I’m not sure why @Clive is making such a song & dance about this. He wants to start a new scheme. All he needs to do is get acceptance of the scheme by the grain buyers. Set up an auditing system for members and then come up with a membership price. It will be easier to “pass” and cheaper. Everyone will join who wants to. Why would you stay with Red Tractor? His scheme will be a massive success, market forces will ensure that. Why does he need a poll?
 

Farma Parma

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Northumberlandia
im not thinking if doing anything unless we reach a point of no alternative, i have no ambition to start a scheme, i really have enough to do and frankly i can not think of a industry more boring than assurance !

i would rather hope we can make Red Tractor actually engage with farmers and see clearly what they want from a scheme
oh right deffo count me in then, its red tape gone nuts as it is.
 

Clive

Staff Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lichfield
I’m not sure why @Clive is making such a song & dance about this. He wants to start a new scheme. All he needs to do is get acceptance of the scheme by the grain buyers. Set up an auditing system for members and then come up with a membership price. It will be easier to “pass” and cheaper. Everyone will join who wants to. Why would you stay with Red Tractor? His scheme will be a massive success, market forces will ensure that. Why does he need a poll?

i don’t want to start a new scheme, i would much rather the one we had was made fit for purpose

we need to send a message
 
This is the reason I voted Leave. Jobs for the boys and girls and The Civil Service including the numpty managers in PHE who have proved again they are useless. The CS is the only "business?" in this country that has never used technology to cut labour and costs, just made more rules and paper to justify themselves.
The argument was always, Minister (that sclerotic overpaid bunch in Brussels) the EU says we have to do it. That cover story is blown now although it will drag on for a while. Boris reckons he will cure the economy by having more civil servants however a combination of events to do with Brexit and Covid will mean a lot less money generated by the private sector. The minute we begin to look like a bad bet in the world debt stakes there will have to be a major clear out of these people. The money comes in at the top from PS and the CS just creams off some and stirs it around. They do not create directly any money only consume it.
 

Steevo

Member
Location
Gloucestershire
the NFU argued just this recently when trade deals were being talked about but totally i unsuccessfully ....... its just not realistically achievable whilst keeping access to export markets and if it wasn’t for imports food would sadly increase poverty in the uk

Exactly. Everyone seems to want to ramp up regs and not reduce them, yet strangely are happy that imports are less than UK domestic and do not seem to want to raise them because they can’t have it both ways. High standards and cheap food.
 

Steevo

Member
Location
Gloucestershire
Cheapest way round for uk ag would be to not exceed the imported standard.

See post #20 of this thread for the AIC/UFAS imported standards, but they are gold plated compared to import standards.

It would indeed. I would be happy with any standard as long as it was equal.

There should be one single standard, full stop. High or low it matters not.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
It would indeed. I would be happy with any standard as long as it was equal.

There should be one single standard, full stop. High or low it matters not.
Spot on Steevo.

If we were gettin £10/t bonus for having a sticker it'd be different. But we're not, there's no premium price for ACCS grain, and I think it was possibly inferred there would be at the outset of the scheme.
 

Farma Parma

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Northumberlandia
Exactly. Everyone seems to want to ramp up regs and not reduce them, yet strangely are happy that imports are less than UK domestic and do not seem to want to raise them because they can’t have it both ways. High standards and cheap food.
i seen all of that & there is more too this not making other countries adhere to the stricter standards we have too than meets the eye but where the idiots who's pocket this hurts the most
annoys the hell out of us all
 

Farma Parma

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Northumberlandia
Spot on Steevo.

If we were gettin £10/t bonus for having a sticker it'd be different. But we're not, there's no premium price for ACCS grain, and I think it was possibly inferred there would be at the outset of the scheme.
the crack some 20year was oh you will get £3-4 more per ton for being fully assured its a great thing this.... never seen a penny of that yet
 

FarmyStu

Member
Location
NE Lincs
Would it be possible to ‘formally present/ publish’ the results in a way that can be sent and presented to industry organisations and MPs and the like ? This would at least make a professional stance
They would want to know who the voters were. It seems anyone can vote whether or not they are affected. It's pointless. You need a poll of RT members only.

As it's a voluntary scheme, you might find that they suggest anyone not happy with the scheme, simply leaves......
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
They would want to know who the voters were. It seems anyone can vote whether or not they are affected. It's pointless. You need a poll of RT members only.

As it's a voluntary scheme, you might find that they suggest anyone not happy with the scheme, simply leaves......
I'm under the impreasion that it's probably not legal for either a company with market dominance (think one of the big UK rape crushers) or company with smaller market share if they are all acting together under a common set of trade body rules (for example the mills acting under the UFAS scheme), to have dissimilar trading conditions to similar transactions.

So if the company buys non assured grain from non-uk producers, but stipulates UK grain must be RT assured, then I think this would be illegal.

Check out Chapter 1 of the Competitions Act 1998. Example of a condition which is prohibited:-

"agreements which apply dissimilar conditions to similar transactions, placing other trading parties at a disadvantage"

Companies can be fined up to 10% of global turnover, so quite a serious reason for them to change their requirement for UK grain to be RT assured.
 

FarmyStu

Member
Location
NE Lincs
I'm under the impreasion that it's probably not legal for either a company with market dominance (think one of the big UK rape crushers) or company with smaller market share if they are all acting together under a common set of trade body rules (for example the mills acting under the UFAS scheme), to have dissimilar trading conditions to similar transactions.

So if the company buys non assured grain from non-uk producers, but stipulates UK grain must be RT assured, then I think this would be illegal.

Check out Chapter 1 of the Competitions Act 1998. Example of a condition which is prohibited:-

"agreements which apply dissimilar conditions to similar transactions, placing other trading parties at a disadvantage"

Companies can be fined up to 10% of global turnover, so quite a serious reason for them to change their requirement for UK grain to be RT assured.
Take them to court. Crowd fund it on here.

That said, whatever the result, I am quite sure that it will not lead to a lowering of requirements on British farms. Surely everyone on here can see that what many appear to be arguing for is a lowering of standards? Down to legal requirements only? That is an impossible sell to anyone except some farmers. So long as we live in a developed 1st world country, this will never happen. Never.

Can you imagine the negative publicity it would generate for British agriculture???
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 10 4.1%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 853
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top