- Location
- People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Looking for a job in government? As you sound as big a tool as 1 of them..Do you not understand statistics or maths. Yes more people die of dog attacks than farmers die because fido has run them over. There are what 70 million people in this country so say 25 million have dogs... of that 25 million. Only 10,000 at most will be farmers that take their dogs to work.......
Dogs should not be in cabs....
I understand they are good for mental health but they should not be in cabs unless In a secure box.
Maths and statistics mean fudge all when its less than 1 death a year.
In fact the doom sayers here have found 1 reported example of dog moving leaver and 1 unreported.
Both cases it was farmers fault.
No hand brake on.
Engine running.
Dog in cab.
There no reported accidents of dog causing accident when farmer and dog in cab together.
(Probably more deaths from machines with no dogs in them...)
So you want to ban dogs in cabs for no cases? Stopping 1,000s of farmers having pleasure of their faithful friend with them a day, when they working alone for hours at a time. You sound like a proper council/gov worker....
Oh we better all give up beef farming as well then , after all farmers ARE killed every year by cattle and its not possible to eliminate all the risk when dealing with cattle .
After all when your maths and statistics will show much more risk and deaths from cows than dog in a cab and you want to ban dogs, how can you justify working with cattle,?
To sum up.
Dogs in cab with farmers zero risk.
Dog left in cab, with engine running and no handbrake on, slight risk.
Take dog out of cab when you get out (which i am sure 99% do anyway to let it stretch its legs and have a pee) and risk eliminated.
There, did not need maths and a gov statistics official to solve that now did it.