UK ACORN,FARM FINANCE,DES PHILLIPS,BEWARE!!!!!

[Dog catcher]

The difference between Toad & co & Rolls Royce is they create jobs & keep the country with a world class company recognised internationally
Toad & co destroy jobs & lives just to enrich themselves

 

[mgb]

Sorry your missing the point,where do you draw the line there must be right and wrong sfo have crossed line

 

[Dog catcher]

S F O have crossed the line on a regular basis for the last 20 years telll us news not history

 

[mgb]

This is news it shows genraul public sfo has no credibility so helps our cause a great deal

 

[renewablejohn]

This is news it shows genraul public sfo has no credibility so helps our cause a great deal

Depends whether you call it fraud or a facility fee to get the job done. Most countries treat it as a facility fee without which they would not be able to source sophisticated technology.

 

[mendips]

Depends whether you call it fraud or a facility fee to get the job done. Most countries treat it as a facility fee without which they would not be able to source sophisticated technology.

Well to me it is and always has been a backhander and not of the type my father used give me around the ear. That said, many 'campaigns' such as this thread have fallen flat when contributors have taken to petty point scoring, I really hope that does not happen here and remain confident it will not. Goodnight.

 

[mgb]

On lighter side another good article on line in this weeks farmers weekly gathering storm approaches Mr williams

 

[Ley253]

Just where is the line between commission and bribe drawn?

 

[renewablejohn]

Well to me it is and always has been a backhander and not of the type my father used give me around the ear. That said, many 'campaigns' such as this thread have fallen flat when contributors have taken to petty point scoring, I really hope that does not happen here and remain confident it will not. Goodnight.

So would you class a S106 payment which most councils charge a backhander or a facility fee.

 

[mendips]

So would you class a S106 payment which most councils charge a backhander or a facility fee.

The fact is 'developer contributions' have been a matter of fact for many years - I prefer to call them backhanders but that said they are in the public domain and moral righteousness calls for different terminology than I choose to use, like lambs to the slaughter most of us seem to prefer it that way. 30 years ago I had a 'run in' with my local council, I was in the wrong but was able to negotiate a way out by way of a monetary consideration. I think then it was called a 'settlement' and was all above board - hah bloody ha - internally I was spitting nails, sweeteners happen and the good old english language has adjectives to suit.

 

[Acornworm]

Well to me it is and always has been a backhander and not of the type my father used give me around the ear. That said, many 'campaigns' such as this thread have fallen flat when contributors have taken to petty point scoring, I really hope that does not happen here and remain confident it will not. Goodnight.

Yes,much more comforting discussing the impending problems for Williams,Phillips et al.

 

[mendips]

Yes,much more comforting discussing the impending problems for Williams,Phillips et al.

...... and discussing compensation/restitution will be even more palatable

 

[Dog catcher]

Still no report on the Williams case another attempt at coverup ?

 

[Acornworm]

Still no report on the Williams case another attempt at coverup ?

I'd rather think not,bearing in mind the large number of complainants that the SRA turned away.Williams can only be struck off once and that appears to have been done with ease.Are the SDT going to go easy on a man whose antics have brought ridicule and disrepute to their profession,I hope not.
But if they do,so what,there is a wealth of information out there in the public domain,waiting for somebody to join up all the dots,not just some of them.The next week might also bring a large number of 'unconsidered ' dots making it an even bigger picture.

 

[mendips]

Still no report on the Williams case another attempt at coverup ?

As above suspect not, £195,00 costs and struck off seems to confirm. The SDT aim to publicise their decision within seven weeks after the hearing but this can be longer in complex cases. Williams has 21 days after publication to lodge an appeal, at the moment patience could well be a virtue. Not certain but if Williams loses any appeal it may well be that he can then seek a Judicial Revue, ANother may be able to give us better insight into procedure. Misguided pride and his insurers may well keep him going but those lining up to bat against him need to be able to use his destroyed credibility against him and the whole deceptive 'set up' - the sooner he runs out of places to hide the better.

 

[renewablejohn]

...... and discussing compensation/restitution will be even more palatable

Be careful what you wish. I proved to the satisfaction of the court that LMC had not signed my agreement and the judge decided the contract was unenforceable. Great you would think but no all it does is give the Judge total power to do whatever they like under restitution with an obvious biase to support the financial institutions which are deemed to be the backbone of our economy. Hence my case is now going to appeal.

 

[Vile Farm]

looks like the lender is putting tin shed up for sale

could this spark a bidding war between Gleek & Medlock

 

[mendips]

Be careful what you wish. I proved to the satisfaction of the court that LMC had not signed my agreement and the judge decided the contract was unenforceable. Great you would think but know all it does is give the Judge total power to do whatever they like under restitution with an obvious biase to support the financial institutions which are deemed to be the backbone of our economy. Hence my case is now going to appeal.

Wish you well with your appeal. From afar it seems there may be differences between your cause and the cause of those who fell into the Acorn trap. My suspicions of the differences might well be described as 'deliberate criminality' by Acorn.
As you are going to appeal I am unsure just how much of your situation you should discuss on here so please be wary

 

[renewablejohn]

Wish you well with your appeal. From afar it seems there may be differences between your cause and the cause of those who fell into the Acorn trap. My suspicions of the differences might well be described as 'deliberate criminality' by Acorn.
As you are going to appeal I am unsure just how much of your situation you should discuss on here so please be wary

Unfortunately it is so similar the only difference is I have managed to take action prior to them securing a possession order many victims have not managed to do this. Your right I would love to expose what went on at trial but as you say the Appeal makes that very difficult. At least it does not stop me reporting to MP's the SFO and the FCA.

 

[mendips]

Unfortunately it is so similar the only difference is I have managed to take action prior to them securing a possession order many victims have not managed to do this. Your right I would love to expose what went on at trial but as you say the Appeal makes that very difficult. At least it does not stop me reporting to MP's the SFO and the FCA.