Certainly going to make it harder.Probably done to ease the burden on the courts,supposedly.Coupled with the removal of legal aid this will prove to be a charter for the bent and manipulative lawyers,of which there are many.The failure of the Police to investigate,be it down to finances or ignorance does not help.You are then forced down the civil route,which as we know favours the party with the dirtiest lawyer and the deepest pockets(they normally come together),hardly justice.Seems you no longer have a right to appeal.
http://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2016...-the-court-of-appeal-to-apply-from-3-october/
This country is getting more like a dictatorship.
This was the second time that this guys story has been pulled from a documentary.Seems to me that Lloyds are particularily keen to keep their 'receivers' out of the spotlight,surely a major high street bank haven't got anything to hide?Watch news tonight major announcement on connection between Lloyds bank &a alder king should be interesting
Ah,but did he have legal advice..........................obviously a good lawyer would have pointed out those pitfalls .Wasn't this at the same time he was churning out all the crap how he understood the farmers needs and could provide the financial solution.so the principal of UKCC, UKFF, UKAF etc etc tries to claim damages from the bank for not advising him of the risks of this lending, and for not providing further lending facilities when he couldnt manage his existing lending due to the credit crunch???