It certainly looks like a confused situation, but can you expect anything else with Des involved. As for the auction proposed for September 6th, since the possession hearing is only set for August 25th, such a proposal appears optimistic especially when the Des factor is again involved. One can only question how much of this is for domestic investor consumption as the Loan Book appears as healthy as the others being mentioned. There again as Des is well known to the F.C.A., the D.B.I.S. and the F.S.A. before, they need to look no further to obtain detailed insight as to how the P.2.P. lending is abused by con artists as they have yet to issue guide lines on how such lending should proceed.Does this mean that the buyer for the Tin Shed was not real, or did not have the money, or did Lendy find out that it was in fact Des under another name?