I apologise if you thought it showed bias but I'd just like to state that this survey has been proof read by multiple university lecturers, professionally trained in this field, it would not have been distributed if it in any way showed bias. The statement regarding the impact of neonics on bumblebee health and welfare has been scientifically proven therefore does not show any bias.
I am considering other causes of bumblebee decline as well however agriculture has been scientifically proven to be the main cause, hence my choice to investigate this further. I personally do not agree that agriculture is the main driver as many farmers have adapted to more environmentally friendly farming approaches.
Thank you for taking the time to reply. Welcome to an Internet forum where opinions are very common! I don't care how many academics have proof read the questionnaire - the sugar beet question was a loaded one! I have had a lot of lectures at postgraduate level on research methods & how to phrase questions & this was a key part of my MBA dissertation for the primary research.
In the real world, I have recently answered 2 consultations with even more heavily loaded questions than yours - never ask a question you might not like the answer to! Don't lose sleep over it, don't believe every peer reviewed article you read - everyone has an agenda, and good luck with your studies
This book is a useful tool for designing your primary data gathering;