Vaccines Do Not Stop COVID-19 Spread As Governments Claim: Legal Advocacy Group

bluegreen

Member
Authored by Andrew Chen via The EPoch Times,

Vaccines are not as effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 as governments have claimed them to be, an analysis of government narratives conducted by a constitutional rights group shows.
The report (pdf), published Tuesday by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, found that claims made by government leaders that mandatory vaccination will reduce or stop the spread of COVID-19 are not supported by either medical science or real-life experience in the countries that have achieved the highest level of vaccination.

“Unfortunately, and contrary to government-led narratives and media coverage in both Canada and the U.S., the evidence strongly suggests vaccinations do not stop the spread of Covid - not the original strains, and not the later Delta and Omicron variants,” the Justice Centre said.
In its analysis, the legal advocacy group compared government-led narrative and what authoritative health agencies say about vaccine effectiveness in stopping the spread of the coronavirus with the actual situation in “heavily vaccinated communities,” including Israel, the United Kingdom, the U.S. state of Vermont, Gibraltar, and Sweden.

“We conclude that whatever value vaccines may have in reducing hospitalization and mortality, they do not ‘work’ with the thoroughness government leaders claim, and certainly not to the degree that mandatory enforcement or vaccine passports could ever be justified in Canada as a reasonable limitation upon individual rights to bodily autonomy and Charter freedoms,” the Justice Centre said.

Goal of Vaccines Redefined

The Justice Centre said that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) change of definition of a “vaccine” in September has effectively switched its goal from producing “immunity” to merely providing “protection” against an infectious disease.

According to the CDC website, “vaccination” is now defined as “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.”

In response to social media controversies following the revised definition, the CDC said the previous definitions could have been interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100 percent effective, which “has never been the case for any vaccine.”

The Justice Centre also found many government-led narratives and health policies to be socially divisive.

While Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Joe Biden repeated the narrative that vaccines work, both leaders have introduced restrictions requiring employers to enforce mandatory COVID-19 vaccination mandates.

“With these actions, Prime Minister Trudeau and President Biden have separated Canadians and Americans into two groups: those who can fully participate in society and those who, having been first excluded from events and restaurants, can now be barred from earning a living, often in employment they have enjoyed for decades,” the Justice Centre said.

Evidence of Reinfection

Public enthusiasm for mass vaccination stemmed from the concept of “herd immunity,” which means that when enough people within a society become immune to a disease, it becomes harder for an infected individual to spread the virus.

However, the Justice Centre noted that real-world evidence shows that even in heavily vaccinated communities around the world, fully vaccinated people continue to contract and die from COVID-19.

One of the most notable examples is Israel, which was the first country in the world to have the majority of its citizens fully vaccinated. However, cases started to surge in June 2021, and over 13,000 fully vaccinated individuals had breakthrough infections between July 11 and July 31, 2021.

“To date, no government has presented the public with evidence to support its repeated and fear-filled propaganda message that the Covid vaccine stops the spread of Covid,” the Justice Centre said.
“In a free and democratic society, an ineffective policy of mandatory vaccination and vaccine passports to participate in normal society, deliberately excluding unvaccinated Canadians from civil society, cannot be justified as a reasonable limitation upon Charter rights and freedoms.”
 

will l

Member
Arable Farmer
1640431783032.png
 

Goweresque

Member
Location
North Wilts

You do realise a) all historical (and scientific) evidence shows that respiratory viruses tend to mutate towards less virulent (but more infectious) variants, and b) 'the damned shot' is based on the spike protein on the initial Wuhan covid variant (ie the virus at the top of your picture) and thus the vaccines will be less and less effective towards the new variants at the bottom, indeed could be actively detrimental as appears to be the case with Omicron?
 

essex man

Member
Location
colchester
You do realise a) all historical (and scientific) evidence shows that respiratory viruses tend to mutate towards less virulent (but more infectious) variants, and b) 'the damned shot' is based on the spike protein on the initial Wuhan covid variant (ie the virus at the top of your picture) and thus the vaccines will be less and less effective towards the new variants at the bottom, indeed could be actively detrimental as appears to be the case with Omicron?
Restricting the virus in its spread was also restricting this evolution towards less harmful strains.
Many have been arguing(including myself) since the start that unrestricted virus spread in the non vulnerable population was the quickest way to achieve this evolution.
 
Restricting the virus in its spread was also restricting this evolution towards less harmful strains.
Many have been arguing(including myself) since the start that unrestricted virus spread in the non vulnerable population was the quickest way to achieve this evolution.
Quickest and most lethal probably.
That website is a crock of old rubbish anyrood
 

essex man

Member
Location
colchester
Seems a long time ago I first posted this
18 months I think
 

Muck Spreader

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin
Wrong. The aim of any (successful) parasite is not to kill its host, hence as said the evolution towards milder but more transmissible variants is a mark of successful adaptation and evolution.
Simply because a virus' primarily intention is to reproduce, doesn't mean it will not eventually kill it's host especially if it's weak or naïve. And one of the key elements of a coronavirus is the fact that it can prevent mutations that make it weaker and additionally it can recombine chunks of RNA with own variants or other even coronaviruses.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 79 42.0%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 66 35.1%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 30 16.0%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 7 3.7%

Red Tractor drops launch of green farming scheme amid anger from farmers

  • 1,292
  • 1
As reported in Independent


quote: “Red Tractor has confirmed it is dropping plans to launch its green farming assurance standard in April“

read the TFF thread here: https://thefarmingforum.co.uk/index.php?threads/gfc-was-to-go-ahead-now-not-going-ahead.405234/
Top