If they had any sense, they'd pay those on better land a production sub to keep food cheap and those on marginal land (90% of Wales) an environment park keeper sub
well start with the basic facts.. there is less money in the pot in real terms. some of the pot will be getting robbed by large hands not previously eligible to draw from the pot... unlike BPS which was handed out for no cost to you but a few hours form filling, what little bit is left in the pot will require you to put in considerable time, cost and income foregone in order to put you hand in to draw a few coins from the bottom... for those not willing to jump though the new hoops the pot will look very empty.I have heard multiple times, how the new schemes will allow the powers that be to pay us a margin on enviro works, rather than ‘income foregone’, which was forced on government by those nasty people at the EU.
We’ll see.
The figures only tell half the story... meat breaks down into many different products which have different demand and different value in different parts of the world. The cuts the UK imports are generally not the same as those we export. To change the import/export balance you have to start by changing consumer behavior.View attachment 985991
Looks to me as though the UK would be a good market for Welsh lamb if didn’t import virtually the same amount as Welsh farmers produce from the other side of the globe!
The figures only tell half the story... meat breaks down into many different products which have different demand and different value in different parts of the world. The cuts the UK imports are generally not the same as those we export. To change the import/export balance you have to start by changing consumer behavior.
I’ve looked into this and I don’t agree. consumer behaviour would change rapidly enough if there were only certain cuts available.The figures only tell half the story... meat breaks down into many different products which have different demand and different value in different parts of the world. The cuts the UK imports are generally not the same as those we export. To change the import/export balance you have to start by changing consumer behavior.
Yes the new behaviour brought about by shelves short of lamb legs and chops but full of offal would be a shift to other meats if not rioting and voting out the government responsible at the first opportunity...I’ve looked into this and I don’t agree. consumer behaviour would change rapidly enough if there were only certain cuts available.
We‘re talking about different cuts of meat here - not the difference between chops and offal.Yes the new behaviour brought about by shelves short of lamb legs and chops but full of offal would be a shift to other meats if not rioting and voting out the government responsible at the first opportunity...
It does seem sensible to continue with a system that is now working relatively well, while a new system is planned properly, as well as allowing farmers in Wales some certainty in order to plan & budget accordingly. Far more sensible than Westminster’s approach of slashing funding and imagining they can implement a completely new system, with new objectives, within a couple of years and at the same time. That seems a reckless ambition, at best.
However, the extension of Glastir Advanced contracts is only for cropping options ime, with no possibility of doing any further contract works. That means that my own income from Glastir is down from c.£8k/yr to c.£2k/yr, albeit with fewer expenses on my part too of course.
It’s more a ‘limping on’, rather than an extension of the program.
The senedd doing what it does best - no one wants to be responsible for making a decision - just in case the fan is pointing in their directionWelsh farm subsidy changes delayed again to 2025
The transitions to new subsidy arrangements following Brexit are already under way in England.www.bbc.co.uk
Defer to next elections and blame everyone , and say supporting farmers most likely???The senedd doing what it does best - no one wants to be responsible for making a decision - just in case the fan is pointing in their direction
when the sh*t hits it - so they keep talking round in circles. No doubt, with plans to increase the number of MP's the excuse will be "that they need
to wait for the views of these new members in order to have a balanced scheme". We get the politicians we deserve.
They talk about wanting a progressive, developing industry that nurtures new entrants, and developing forward thinking businesses, and now we have a system which will still in many ways be based on what you were farming in 2001, 24 years on....
It's beyond a joke for new entrants. Meanwhile WG modulate the fund, to skim cash off, to subsidise British Airways planting trees....
Without jumping to any conclusions, or personal jibes, that's quite an easy conclusion to arrive at, if you are established...I agree. But I've come to the conclusion farming doesn't need the new entrants it claims to need either
Without jumping to any conclusions, or personal jibes, that's quite an easy conclusion to arrive at, if you are established...
In saying that, what we farm, is at a somewhat reduced rent, as the LL receives the historic payment.
However, as it's legally managed (at least in terms of cross compliance for their historic entitlements) by the LL, it's not to all intense purposes managed at all, with no incentive for the LL or tenant to actually farm the land- and there's plenty like it, stagnating into poorer grazing year on year, with little environmental or economic benefit- other than the historic payment, and the IHT relief it was purchased for....