Thanks for sharing your experience, very illuminating!@Pasty
I looked into the Natural England stewardship option as a Dartmoor farmer some eight years ago as we are slowly intent on creating the largest forest garden in the UK. Firstly I had to pay something like £400 to for a ludicrous website / schedule for both teacher and another for the kids. Secondly Natural England did not assist of inform on the insurance issue. There have been massively expensive cases brought about by mistakes made on children visits ( not necessarily farms but one has to remember a farm can be a dangerous place). Thirdly there had to be a minimum of four visits in the year and obviously none of the schools plumb for winter visits so they are bunched up in the summer which is the busiest time for the farmer. Also the school and more importantly the farmer has to write up reports for Natural England to accept after the visit. The school could, for example complain about the farmer. If they are not happy with the farmer's or school teacher's report they will deduct money. I have had around £6000 deducted from HLS, OELS, UELS and SFP schemes over the last two years and they are complaining at the moment ( and this is perfectly true) as the NE officer and RPA inspector cannot find 5 of my trees. They have not visited of asked me where they are...so presumably are using Arial photography. As I have over 20000 trees they must be having lay a laugh. The money Natural England were willing to pay me for school trips ( I recall eight years ago being about £400 for four visits) would not even cover the costs of the insurance. However the idea of school visits is excellent - the problem being the Rural Payments Agency ( who pay the money and do the inspecting) and Natural England ( who initiate these schemes) - are both management top heavy agencies and need urgently to be reviewed as they performance is poor value for money. One of the biggest criticisms I have of both these agencies is their negativity i.e. programmed to look for problems to deduct money rather than reward for the benefits. In 9 years I have had not one compliment - being totally organic, and ethical I can only conclude something is seriously wrong ; the RPA officers no nothing about farming but simply walk around your farm with a hand held devise - it's akin to inviting an enemy into your house. I have opted out of BPS and will soon be rid of the NE schemes.
Sorry for the long answer to school visits but it helps to know the background to these social and environmental schemes that are not all they are cracked up to be. Most farmers have joined up to these schemes because their incomes are so low they simply cannot survive without the extra money. If you asked them privately what they think of NE and the RPA it would probably be unprintable.