I have said all I need to say regarding the conduct of the SOP and have made no recent comment on here regarding the Nationals, their conduct, the judging simply because I have no first hand knowledge of what went on. Moreover I have no up to date knowledge of the running of the SOP as I seldom talk to people who have any knowledge about what goes on. I have posted comments in the last few days in response to prompts but I can only relate to first hand experiences that occurred in the distant past. These were not figments of my imagination and memories will never be erased but I admit that they are historical and should not cloud the judgement of those coming into the sport. I repeat that I have not actively participated in the condemnation of judging at the National but I have noticed that some of the early critics now seem to have shifted their position.