caveman
Member
- Location
- East Sussex.
I asked henarar if he agreed.You replied and said Nope. Now you say you were not agreeing or disagreeing with me, but you were, you disagreed by saying Nope when I asked if another poster agreed.
Here is what I posted about IQ :
Your sample of 4 people is statistically insignificant. You know the old lies, damned lies and statistics. Theoretically you could be correct, but given 60-odd million people I am sure you are not going to find three quarters of them have an IQ at a level sufficiently high that only one quarter is below the mean.
I accept too that it may not be an exactly equal split - it could quite easliy be 52% and 48%, so I acknowlede that my 50:50 split was being overly simplistic. My point though, that the bottom 25% of a population is unlikely to think in the same way as, say, the top 25% is, I believe, still valid.
Nope again.
I said nope........ as in your suggestion on the statistics was wrong.
That is all.
I am obviously not intelligent enough to get my message across to you.
Or your such an educated idiot that you can't think outside of the box.
Hey ho.
I note your introduction of the word "mean" in your last post.
Your obviously assuming my "nope" was directed as an answer to your question to Henerar......
Much as.....
Your suggestion that many of the Scots assumed the question on the ballot paper was directed at Scottish membership of the EU only.
Or as many chose to read as gospel (for purposes of their own pathetic counter) that £350 million and NHS written on the side of a bus meant that the NHS would be in receipt of £350 each and every week, guaranteed, after the winning of a vote.
Hey ho again.
Last edited: