Talking to old boys it’s been around here forever. They just had chemicals to control it!I don't think it's new! It's been around a fair while. Most of the land it thrives on was grassland not long ago.
Talking to old boys it’s been around here forever. They just had chemicals to control it!I don't think it's new! It's been around a fair while. Most of the land it thrives on was grassland not long ago.
and yes, our worst areas are what we call "meadow ground"I don't think it's new! It's been around a fair while. Most of the land it thrives on was grassland not long ago.
Unless you've had one on farm side by side you never will see the benefits of a gd.
They're not meant for fast drilling, they're meant for low disturbance, and at 8kmh there is none.
I've got a dale over the road from me.
It's doing a good job, but there is definitely a lot more disturbance than my gd.
I spent several years saying tines are better than discs.
Until I took the plunge .
Now I say they each have their ideal place.
And a tine is miles better in the wet. A disc in the dry.
A gd copes well in both situations, but can definitely run in conditions you ought not to be there, and it will fail in very wet conditions.
A tine (my KV) excells in the wet and produces amazing crops in conditions you ought not to be out in.
But for BG the gd wins hands down.
Dry but not too dry, wet but not too wet...
I’m biased of course but I think you’ve just described why many are putting metcalfe onto a sprinter; light, strong, no wheels behind tines, staggered packer and with 250kg on a 12mm coulter will seed to depths a disc drill can only dream about in wet and dry soilYes moving from a ts to a gd I can second all of that but in an ideal world I’d like to make my own tine drill for wet weather similar to a ts with wheels on the front where it’s dry but heavier duty frame with metcalf points and a following harrow. The trouble with a lot of the direct drilling tine drills is they are heavy and they have wheels behind the tines which makes them rubbish in the wet
problem with my sprinter its 30cm row spacing so i have to put a 2 inch dutch on it to get 25mm spacing. trying to find a way to put some more coulters on but I dont think its possible with the frame.I’m biased of course but I think you’ve just described why many are putting metcalfe onto a sprinter; light, strong, no wheels behind tines, staggered packer and with 250kg on a 12mm coulter will seed to depths a disc drill can only dream about in wet and dry soil
I thought the horsch Twinter thread was a good economicalproblem with my sprinter its 30cm row spacing so i have to put a 2 inch dutch on it to get 25mm spacing. trying to find a way to put some more coulters on but I dont think its possible with the frame.
I thought that was a fantastic conversion; mines 250 spacing but it’s definitely something I would consider… but looking at the crops now; they’ve all closed up the gaps. Time will tell when harvest arrives whether there’s a yield penalty of the wider rows.I thought the horsch Twinter thread was a good economical
option for this.
can you point me in the right direction?I thought the horsch Twinter thread was a good economical
option for this.
Yep, you are making my point, not all tines are equal, If you are drilling combinables why do you need anything above 1/2" wide esp if you have a grassweed problem. Of course tines wont be suitable in a big biomass cover crop, this is where the disc comes into it own.I agree; there’s tines and tines. I bet if you put a GD doing 12k next to a 12mm metcalfe or similar equipped drill doing 8k you would struggle to tell the finished job apart. Yes if you go steadier u would move less with a disc but, unless you’re drilling into a LOT of trash/cover crops...I really struggle to see the benefits of a disc drill over a tine (tin hat on). I do however think that duetts/Dutch/bourghalt tine coulters move too much soil; especially on more bodied stuff. Fine if no bg.
Plenty of thoughts, and experience.Got any thoughts on how rolling affects the BG?
The soil conditions at the point of rolling will undoubtably affect the result, as will the amount of cover crop biomass present.If I was to roll following avatar into cover crops would I be making more germinate?
thanks, looks good, but i really just want to make it single rows of 25 cm, so the possibility to hoe is still there
care to share?!Plenty of thoughts, and experience.
The soil conditions at the point of rolling will undoubtably affect the result, as will the amount of cover crop biomass present.
I would but it'd be like War and Peace. Your question is so opened ended, and that's not meant to sound derisory, but it's like so many of the questions and answers on this forum, the devil is in the detail and most of the time there is not enough detail to draw out a conclusion. So, for example, are you talking about rolling in wet, dry or intermediate conditions, what level of cover crop biomass, and consistency of cover do you have, history of blackgrass in the field etc etc etc. I am not trying to be clever but all these variables will have an effect on the outcome, hence my rather bland answer above.care to share?!
and or a rotation me thinks, my monicker gives my bias away though ryegrass is a curse but grass pays better than most combinables here most yearsTalking to old boys it’s been around here forever. They just had chemicals to control it!
I don’t think trash is a problem, we applied chemical onto massive cover crops and can see very vividly where it’s gone off too early. It might lower control slightly. Hard to knowCurrently roguing BG and I'll say that the vast majority this year is:
In a field where we applied digestate and the umbilical has rubbed soil that wasn't quite dry enough.
Emerging from cracks from the very dry April.
Shielded from chem by trash.
Good answer! Points taken.I would but it'd be like War and Peace. Your question is so opened ended, and that's not meant to sound derisory, but it's like so many of the questions and answers on this forum, the devil is in the detail and most of the time there is not enough detail to draw out a conclusion. So, for example, are you talking about rolling in wet, dry or intermediate conditions, what level of cover crop biomass, and consistency of cover do you have, history of blackgrass in the field etc etc etc. I am not trying to be clever but all these variables will have an effect on the outcome, hence my rather bland answer above.
Its much easier just to say that I think you have a good understanding of the effects of movement and light interception on the germination of blackgrass and you need to take this into account with every field operation with a view to minimising the opportunity for the seed to have the conditions and environment to germinate. Again I stress I am not trying to be clever but this is a situation where every situation is different and you need to weigh up the pros and cons of every action and not just take broad brush approach. Keep following the system, as you are, of CA but focus on making every decision on a field by field basis and respect the soil. But I think you are doing this anyway from what I read, except maybe the Quadtrac.
But then the petrol(diesel)head horsepower obsessed engineer in me understands the draw of a big machine. Did I say that in public....
On one hand I'm sorry to hear that (feel the power), on the other hand the soil is cheering....Good answer! Points taken.
by the way, the quad track has gone!
I don’t think trash is a problem, we applied chemical onto massive cover crops and can see very vividly where it’s gone off too early. It might lower control slightly. Hard to know