Nifarmer19
Member
- Location
- Northern Ireland
Has anyone experience of using the above? Been offered them at a competitive price, but I am reluctant to leave Tama and Silotite for what seems to be an unknown quantity in these parts.
Ive done fairly extensive research (or as best as any lad interested in making the perfect quality bale can, shal we say) into net and plastic because we had a problem here with mould inside some of the bales especially in the last 3 years and even tho nothing has changed in our system, for 15 years before that we didnt have any problems apart from an odd bale that may have got a nip of a briar or bird damage to it and you'd see a small damaged area but only on the outside of the bale.
but this was different,
we were getting a football sized amount of blue/grey mould randomly through the bale, we could only allow that the bad weather we had for near 4 years running was the culprit but when your getting 4 in 10 with mould than its a major problem, 0 bales in 10 is only acceptable in my world.
i aim for a high enough DM content of the bale but nothing off the scale at normally round the 45-65% value and the higher the DM content the more susceptible your bale is to all the bad bacteria but one thing seemed apparent, when the weather goes against you the quality of the products your using get tested to the max, and it would seem that some just arent fit for the job.
among many other things i went to grass and muck in the uk 3 yrs ago to see about additive, net and plastic.
the additive was a minefield but ive since narrowed products down with results there.
The net had got to be a major problem for me, im packing my bales super tight because i want no air in there during fermentation but, and again, during and after the bad years im having problems with bales bursting in the field before the wrapper got as far as them, a lot of the time the wrapper is in the field as im baling or maybe he's an hour behind me because of a delay but we try to keep the window between making the bale and wrapping it tight.
The net i used for years was TAMA, but im putting on 4.2 turns of it in the end just for peace and as you know, TAMA know how to charge for their "edge to edge" net but time has moved on and the edge to edge is somewhat old hat by now, i always found it to be a great net tbh but for the 15,16 and 17 season it was really tested and by god did it let itself down.
Now i was talking to the TAMA boys on their stand over at G&M and lord were they so sure about their net, the problems i was having were, in their eyes, mine alone, there had to be something wrong with the baler, or the grass, or the knives or the diesel but they practically swore on a stack of bibles that it was nothing to do with their net and most likely i didnt know what i was at in their eyes, a ratty pair of lads if i do say so, certainly not the type id want selling my product anyways,
for i must say, ive never met as big a pair of A holes in my time, especially when i asked what was the recorded breaking strain of their net, why wouldn't I, everyone else is happy to mention it in their specs...
but it was a case of How dare i ask such a question, it was the strongest Net on the market and that's that....
WELL its NOT,
now im sorry but i dont have the specific breaking strain tensions as ive looked in my book and i cant find them but trust me when i say,
ZEUS EPICROP GOLD net just blows the rest of the competition out of the water, what was 4.2 turns of tama is now 2.3 of zeus or an odd time in certain grass it might be 3.2 but rare enough tbh.
as of right now im delighted with the Epicrop gold and couldnt speak highly enough of it (make sure its the gold as they do other colours as well which aren't as strong, see their website) and i for one wont be changing to a different net supplier while it stays as strong as it is, its breaking strain is far higher than tama and any of the other net manufacturers when i checked and compared on each of their websites.
id be shocked if you were disappointed in zeus epicrop gold net tbh for im certainly not and i wont be changing to anything else any time soon.
the last of the tama ever here and the first of the epicrop gold back in 17.
Have you any similar experiences with different plastics?Ive done fairly extensive research (or as best as any lad interested in making the perfect quality bale can, shal we say) into net and plastic because we had a problem here with mould inside some of the bales especially in the last 3 years and even tho nothing has changed in our system, for 15 years before that we didnt have any problems apart from an odd bale that may have got a nip of a briar or bird damage to it and you'd see a small damaged area but only on the outside of the bale.
but this was different,
we were getting a football sized amount of blue/grey mould randomly through the bale, we could only allow that the bad weather we had for near 4 years running was the culprit but when your getting 4 in 10 with mould than its a major problem, 0 bales in 10 is only acceptable in my world.
i aim for a high enough DM content of the bale but nothing off the scale at normally round the 45-65% value and the higher the DM content the more susceptible your bale is to all the bad bacteria but one thing seemed apparent, when the weather goes against you the quality of the products your using get tested to the max, and it would seem that some just arent fit for the job.
among many other things i went to grass and muck in the uk 3 yrs ago to see about additive, net and plastic.
the additive was a minefield but ive since narrowed products down with results there.
The net had got to be a major problem for me, im packing my bales super tight because i want no air in there during fermentation but, and again, during and after the bad years im having problems with bales bursting in the field before the wrapper got as far as them, a lot of the time the wrapper is in the field as im baling or maybe he's an hour behind me because of a delay but we try to keep the window between making the bale and wrapping it tight.
The net i used for years was TAMA, but im putting on 4.2 turns of it in the end just for peace and as you know, TAMA know how to charge for their "edge to edge" net but time has moved on and the edge to edge is somewhat old hat by now, i always found it to be a great net tbh but for the 15,16 and 17 season it was really tested and by god did it let itself down.
Now i was talking to the TAMA boys on their stand over at G&M and lord were they so sure about their net, the problems i was having were, in their eyes, mine alone, there had to be something wrong with the baler, or the grass, or the knives or the diesel but they practically swore on a stack of bibles that it was nothing to do with their net and most likely i didnt know what i was at in their eyes, a ratty pair of lads if i do say so, certainly not the type id want selling my product anyways,
for i must say, ive never met as big a pair of A holes in my time, especially when i asked what was the recorded breaking strain of their net, why wouldn't I, everyone else is happy to mention it in their specs...
but it was a case of How dare i ask such a question, it was the strongest Net on the market and that's that....
WELL its NOT,
now im sorry but i dont have the specific breaking strain tensions as ive looked in my book and i cant find them but trust me when i say,
ZEUS EPICROP GOLD net just blows the rest of the competition out of the water, what was 4.2 turns of tama is now 2.3 of zeus or an odd time in certain grass it might be 3.2 but rare enough tbh.
as of right now im delighted with the Epicrop gold and couldnt speak highly enough of it (make sure its the gold as they do other colours as well which aren't as strong, see their website) and i for one wont be changing to a different net supplier while it stays as strong as it is, its breaking strain is far higher than tama and any of the other net manufacturers when i checked and compared on each of their websites.
id be shocked if you were disappointed in zeus epicrop gold net tbh for im certainly not and i wont be changing to anything else any time soon.
the last of the tama ever here and the first of the epicrop gold back in 17.
you wouldn't like to elaborate on Why you wouldn't use it again?, your statement is a bit broad to say the least, ive never used their wrap so im curious as to what faults you found with it??No experience of the net but the wrap is rubbish. I tried their purple wrap and a contractor I used to drive for used their black wrap and neither of us would use it again
The wrap had holes in it and wasn't tacky enough, it was porous, everything that bale wrap shouldn't be. Colour doesn't matter, it's all badyou wouldn't like to elaborate on Why you wouldn't use it again?, your statement is a bit broad to say the least, ive never used their wrap so im curious as to what faults you found with it??
altho you might of been doing something good for charity with your purple wrap but in this country with the climate we have black wrap is the most suitable for baled silage.
It’s a wonder it stuck to the bale to be sure.Was this Mole Valleys own brand netwrap about 10 years ago when they dumped Tama? Think it was called Protector but I always called it pretender as it was crap as use to tear apart with chopped bales. Fairly sure it was made in Grease
of sorts yes.Have you any similar experiences with different plastics?
fair enough if thats what you personally found but its a wonder you continued to apply it to the bales when it was so bad ?.The wrap had holes in it and wasn't tacky enough, it was porous, everything that bale wrap shouldn't be. Colour doesn't matter, it's all bad
you could be dead right Galcam and yep id agree it absorbs less heat than the black but weve had one bad experience with green wrap here about 6 or 7 years ago and we quickly learned it wasn't for us,I’m not saying your wrong Tinman but I read an article in the Farmers Journal a few years back that said green wrap is the better as it reflects the sunlight as opposed to black which absorbs the heat into the bale!! Study was done in the uk I’m fairly sure.
There's 4 types of epicrap? I'd have to look for old boxes to know what we used. As soon as the holes we discovered in the black it was all returned to the supplier. The purple was used up because it's what the customer wanted but 8 layers were applied.fair enough if thats what you personally found but its a wonder you continued to apply it to the bales when it was so bad ?.
when did you discover it was all holes?
which one of the 4 types of it did you use?
interesting.There's 4 types of epicrap? I'd have to look for old boxes to know what we used. As soon as the holes we discovered in the black it was all returned to the supplier. The purple was used up because it's what the customer wanted but 8 layers were applied.
It wouldn't have been the 1650 or 2000, we've had issues with various brands of thinner films in the past so now refuse to use them.interesting.
yeah, a 5 layer, a 7 layer, an enviro plus 1650 and a enviro plus 2000 but when i click on each one im getting a 404 so either their doing maintenance or there is another problem.
if i see some of it somewhere ill try a roll of it to see for myself but what you found dosent bode well for now at least.
https://www.zeuspackaging.net/uk/agricultural-packaging/bale-wrap/