beefandsleep
Member
- Location
- Staffordshire
Think we will go round in circles with this one. But there is only one side being reported here. Whatever reason they have for not giving their side is theirs and you can't draw any conclusions from that. I was always taught to be automatically sceptical of anything I read that was not peer reviewed as a scientific paper would be. Newspaper articles are written to sell newspapers and it's often the salacious details that get most prominence and facts and the truth are often brushed over. You can never be sure about the journalistic integrity of articles like this or the political agenda of the writer so it's always helpful to view these kind of articles from a sideways perspective.