Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Regenerative Agriculture and Direct Drilling
Regen Ag General Discussion
Anyone going to Harper Adams University?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="York" data-source="post: 671511" data-attributes="member: 1738"><p>Soren,</p><p>that's the thing. Science has to admit that their "one way view" on statistic's is not applicable for "system evaluation". I'm not in statistics but a good statistic Prof. explained to me that when you have a group which is under the influence of many variables you can get still statistical relevance without replications through time.</p><p>Anyway, for me most interesting was that in Precision Farming they use this "Kriging" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriging" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriging</a> for creating the yield- & other maps. He said that this statistical procedure is not appropriate for this data bases as there are tooo many moving variables. but still it's used and generally accepted. this Prof. is one of the leading proponents of PF in the PF world.</p><p>So in the end the scientific world is still using a unsuited formula as they don't have s. thing better and none is questioning the results. The Prof. also shopped me how to do multi results, totally different looking maps from the same data set. Now every one who has a program can play with the data. And who is saying what is right a& wrong? My conclusion, after working with the PF pioneers for many years, is that in most cases the farmers bottom is the best Precision Farming map. ;-)</p><p>York-Th.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="York, post: 671511, member: 1738"] Soren, that's the thing. Science has to admit that their "one way view" on statistic's is not applicable for "system evaluation". I'm not in statistics but a good statistic Prof. explained to me that when you have a group which is under the influence of many variables you can get still statistical relevance without replications through time. Anyway, for me most interesting was that in Precision Farming they use this "Kriging" [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriging[/url] for creating the yield- & other maps. He said that this statistical procedure is not appropriate for this data bases as there are tooo many moving variables. but still it's used and generally accepted. this Prof. is one of the leading proponents of PF in the PF world. So in the end the scientific world is still using a unsuited formula as they don't have s. thing better and none is questioning the results. The Prof. also shopped me how to do multi results, totally different looking maps from the same data set. Now every one who has a program can play with the data. And who is saying what is right a& wrong? My conclusion, after working with the PF pioneers for many years, is that in most cases the farmers bottom is the best Precision Farming map. ;-) York-Th. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regenerative Agriculture and Direct Drilling
Regen Ag General Discussion
Anyone going to Harper Adams University?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top