Recent content by farmerm

or nuts... edit nut trees I mean, not that it is a nuts idea. :ROFLMAO:

How long is a piece of string... there are so many variables, end of the day land is worth what someone is willing to pay to own it or pay to stop someone else owning it.... today an acre of arable land is economically worth more than an acre of permanent grass, an acre of grass worth more...

Do we :oops: ffs! I normally do the land use updates and BPS claim before doing the CS claim... but having no need to update the land use codes for the BPS claim this never crossed my mind?? Seems they have added a heap of new land use codes...

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/video/news/ukraine-trying-to-hold-the-line/vi-BB1mjMCN?ocid=socialshare&pc=DCTS&cvid=32271dac3b504cd6b3305be03dfa0357&ei=34

What complete and utter bollox, you do live in some weird fantasy world. Kharkiv was always an ambition, the loss to the Ukrainian counter offensive was within russia seen as a significant defeat. Mykolaiv and Odessa were always serious objectives too.. a land bridge to Transnistria and cut...

I’m still debating if the yield potential on my surviving couple of acres justifies a T1 🫤

The fog of war.. it’s impossible for Ukraine to build substantial fortifications along its entire boarder and similarly russia dont either. Remember there have been at least two incisions in the opposite direction into the belgorod region. Good defences are placed where geography assists...

It’s show the war isn’t going to putlers liking…

This is the “strength” of russia, it’s created a population so cuck they are willingly to walk like mindless orcs into almost certain deaths. Ukrainians, like us are typically much more human, survival is one of the most powerful drivers of normal human behaviour Many more russians have also...

hmm and yet all the newer members, they did not join for the benefit of America or to undo the European experiment, they did so for the sake of protecting their own right to self determination. Are the US entirely innocent in all this, of course not, that’s the messy world of geopolitics, but...

If you sir cannot see that russian words and actions of aggression have been the first, second and third drivers of all NATO expansion then you sir are, in the most polite term I can conceive, a complete muppet. NATO is an alliance not an empire. Expansion has come though having shared values...

Farmers are one thing but the man with a business mind will get the bulldozer in first and lower the baseline as far as possible before the ecologist arrives....

You don't play your trump card until the time is right to play your trump card...

trump is merely lining up excuses for future USA inaction. The Nato states underinvesting in defense by 0.1 or 0.2% of GDP is really small change compared to the might the US brings to the table. putler would rather face a European force who invest 5% of GDP in defence but are without USA...

er yes it absolutely is nonsense. Tree planting and other such schemes are unable to keep pace with carbon emissions from deforestation and other bio-carbon losses, that has to be achieved before any bio-carbon storage scheme can be considered an offset to the burning of fossil carbon.